...
首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >Skill acquisition and retention in automated external defibrillator (AED) use and CPR by lay responders: a prospective study.
【24h】

Skill acquisition and retention in automated external defibrillator (AED) use and CPR by lay responders: a prospective study.

机译:非专业应答者在自动体外除颤器(AED)使用和CPR中获得和保留技能:一项前瞻性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This prospective study evaluated the acquisition and retention of skills in cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and the use of the automated external defibrillator (AED) by lay volunteers involved in the Department of Health, England National Defibrillator Programme. One hundred and twelve trainees were tested immediately before and after and initial 4-h class; 76 were similarly reassessed at refresher training 6 months later. A standardised test scenario that required assessment of the casualty, CPR and the use of on AED was evaluated using recording manikin data and video recordings. Before training only 44% of subjects delivered a shock. Afterwards, all did so and the average delay to first shock was reduced by 57 s. All trainees placed the defibrillator electrodes in an "acceptable" position after training, but very few did so in the recommended "ideal" position. After refresher training 80% of subjects used the correct sequence for CPR and shock delivery, yet a third failed to perform adequate safety checks before all shocks. The trainees self-assessed AED competence score was 86 (scale 0-100) after the initial class and their confidence that they would act in a real emergency was rated at a similar level. Initial training improved performance of all CPR skills, although all except compression rate had deteriorated after 6 months. The proportion of subjects able to correctly perform most CPR skill was higher following refresher training that after the initial class. Although this course was judged to be effective in teaching delivery of counter-shocks, the need was identified for more emphasis on positioning of electrodes, pre-shock safety checks, airway opening, ventilation volume, checking for signs of a circulation, hand positioning, and depth and rate of chest compressions.
机译:这项前瞻性研究评估了参与英格兰国家除颤器计划的卫生部门的普通志愿者在心肺复苏(CPR)技能的获取和保留以及自动体外除颤器(AED)的使用。刚开始之前和之后以及最初的4小时课程中测试了112名学员; 6个月后,在进修培训中对76名患者进行了类似的重新评估。使用记录人体模型数据和视频记录,评估了需要评估人员伤亡,CPR和在AED上使用情况的标准化测试方案。在训练之前,只有44%的受试者感到震惊。之后,所有人都这样做了,第一次电击的平均延迟减少了57 s。所有受训者在训练后都将除颤器电极置于“可接受”的位置,但是很少有人在建议的“理想”位置进行除颤器的电极。经过进修训练后,有80%的受试者使用正确的心肺复苏术和电击顺序,而三分之一的受试者在所有电击之前未进行足够的安全检查。学员在第一堂课后对AED的自我评估能力得分为86分(0-100分),他们对自己将在真正的紧急情况下行动的信心也被评定为相似水平。最初的培训改善了所有CPR技能的表现,尽管6个月后除压缩率外所有其他技能均恶化了。经过进修训练后,能够正确执行大多数CPR技能的受试者比例要比初始班后更高。尽管该课程被认为可以有效地教授反电击的教学方法,但已确定需要更加强调电极的位置,电击前的安全检查,气道打开,通风量,循环标志的检查,手的位置,胸部按压的深度和速率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号