...
首页> 外文期刊>Law and human behavior: The official journal of the American Psychology-Law Society >Investigating Investigators: How Presentation Order Influences Participant–Investigators’Interpretations of Eyewitness Identification and Alibi Evidence
【24h】

Investigating Investigators: How Presentation Order Influences Participant–Investigators’Interpretations of Eyewitness Identification and Alibi Evidence

机译:调查研究者:演示顺序如何影响参与者–研究者对目击者识别和Alibi证据的解释

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Presentation order of ID and Alibi evidence was manipulated for undergraduate participants who conducted a simulated police investigation. Experiment 1 found a recency effect when an eyewitness rejected the investigator’s suspect. Experiment 2 also examined order effects, exploring how participant–investigators evaluated alibi information in addition to eyewitness ID information. When investigators saw the witness identify the suspect but also received a strong alibi for that suspect a recency effect occurred, such that whichever piece of information occurred at the end of the procedure had the strongest impact on investigators. Thus, type of evidence and evidence order both had a dramatic influence on participant–investigators’ decisions.
机译:对进行模拟警察调查的大学生参与者,操纵了ID和Alibi证据的显示顺序。当目击者拒绝调查人员的嫌疑人时,实验1发现了新近度效应。实验2还检查了订单效应,探讨了参与者-研究者如何评估目击者ID信息以外的不在场信息。当调查人员看到证人确定了犯罪嫌疑人之后,还收到了针对该犯罪嫌疑人的强有力的辩解,从而产生了新近度影响,因此,程序结束时发生的任何信息对调查人员的影响最大。因此,证据类型和证据顺序都对参与者-研究者的决定产生了巨大影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号