首页> 外文期刊>Radiation measurements >Comparison of population and external detector method dating in epidote
【24h】

Comparison of population and external detector method dating in epidote

机译:种群和外部检测器方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Epidote fission-track dating (FTD) was performed through both Population and external detector method (EDM) in five samples from the Mantiqueira Mountain range, southwestern Brazil. The ages obtained via population conducted to a weighted mean age of (114 +/- 19) Ma. In order to perform EDM dating, it was necessary to measure the efficiency factor (g) between muscovite mica and epidote. Three measurements were performed and the weighted mean g value obtained was (0.57 +/- 0.03). The weighted EDM age was (98 +/- 7) Ma. The population error magnitude occurs due to the existence of few useful epidote grains. EDM provides dating with fewer grains, however there are difficulties concerning etching anisotropy that should be regarded. Both dating methods agreed. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:通过种群和外部检测器方法(EDM)对巴西西南部Mantiqueira山脉的五个样本进行了Epidote裂变径迹测年(FTD)。通过种群获得的年龄进行加权平均年龄为(114 +/- 19)Ma。为了进行EDM测年,有必要测量白云母和云母之间的效率因子(g)。进行了三个测量,并且获得的加权平均g值为(0.57 +/- 0.03)。 EDM的加权年龄为(98 +/- 7)Ma。人口误差幅度的出现是由于几乎没有有用的史密斯晶粒。 EDM提供了较少晶粒的定年,但是在蚀刻各向异性方面存在困难,应予以考虑。两种约会方法都同意。 (c)2007 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号