...
首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory medicine >Comparison of the systemic pharmacodynamic effects and pharmacokinetics of salmeterol delivered by CFC propellant and non-CFC propellant metered dose inhalers in healthy subjects.
【24h】

Comparison of the systemic pharmacodynamic effects and pharmacokinetics of salmeterol delivered by CFC propellant and non-CFC propellant metered dose inhalers in healthy subjects.

机译:CFC推进剂和非CFC推进剂计量吸入器对沙美特罗的全身药效学作用和药代动力学的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study comparing the systemic pharmacodynamic effects (heart rate and serum potassium) and pharmacokinetics of salmeterol delivered by the non-CFC hydrofluoralkane (HFA) propellant 134a and the CFC propellant (propellant 11/12) metered dose inhalers (MDI) in healthy subjects. At the therapeutic dose (50mug), salmeterol-mediated systemic pharmacodynamics were equivalent for the HFA and CFC MDIs. Higher doses of salmeterol (150 and 300mug) produced dose-related beta-agonist pharmacodynamic effects irrespective of the propellant. However, these effects were lower with salmeterol HFA MDI than with the salmeterol CFC MDI at all dose levels. Overall, salmeterol C(max) and AUC((0-)(t)()) values were lower for salmeterol HFA compared with salmeterol CFC MDI. At the highest dose (300mug), where a full pharmacokinetic profile was obtained, exposure to salmeterol delivered by the HFA MDI compared with the salmeterol CFC MDI was 27% and 30% lower for C(max) and AUC((0-)(t)()), respectively. Maximum plasma concentrations were generally seen in the first plasma samples taken 5min after the start of dosing. Salmeterol HFA was well-tolerated. At supratherapeutic doses, adverse events were typical for high-dose salmeterol with fewer adverse events occurring with the HFA compared with the CFC formulation. These data indicate that the salmeterol HFA MDI would not be associated with a significantly different pharmacodynamic, safety and tolerability profile compared with the salmeterol CFC MDI.
机译:这是一项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照的交叉研究,比较了非CFC氢氟烷烃(HFA)推进剂134a和CFC推进剂()产生的沙美特罗的全身药效学作用(心率和血清钾)和药代动力学。推进剂11/12)中的定量吸入器(MDI)。在治疗剂量(50杯)下,沙美特罗介导的全身药效学与HFA和CFC MDI相当。更高剂量的沙美特罗(150和300mug)与剂量无关,都会产生剂量相关的β-激动剂药效学作用。但是,在所有剂量水平下,沙美特罗HFA MDI的作用均低于沙美特罗CFC MDI。总体而言,与沙美特罗CFC MDI相比,沙美特罗HFA的沙美特罗C(max)和AUC((0-)(t)())值较低。在最高剂量(300mug)下,可以获得完整的药代动力学特征,相比于沙美特罗CFC MDI,HFA MDI递送的沙美特罗暴露量比C(max)和AUC((0-)( t)())。通常在开始给药后5分钟采集的第一批血浆样品中观察到最大血浆浓度。 Salmeterol HFA具有良好的耐受性。在超治疗剂量下,大剂量沙美特罗的不良事件是典型的,而与CFC制剂相比,HFA发生的不良事件更少。这些数据表明,与沙美特罗CFC MDI相比,沙美特罗HFA MDI不会具有明显不同的药效,安全性和耐受性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号