...
首页> 外文期刊>Respiration: International Review of Thoracic Diseases >Model-Based versus Clinical Prediction of the Spirometric Response to Lung Volume Reduction Surgery.
【24h】

Model-Based versus Clinical Prediction of the Spirometric Response to Lung Volume Reduction Surgery.

机译:基于模型对肺量减少手术肺活量反应的临床预测与临床预测。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) improves symptoms and lung function in selected patients with severe emphysema. Objectives: We investigated whether models based on physiologic and radiologic predictors discriminated patients with a favorable from those with a poor spirometric response to LVRS. Methods: Data of a derivation cohort of 70 patients who had previously undergone LVRS served to develop two types of prediction models, lookup functions and logistic regression equations. Presence or absence of improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) >/=300 ml and forced vital capacity (FVC) >/=500 ml represented dichotomous outcomes. The residual volume/total lung capacity ratio, CT-radiological emphysema heterogeneity scores and diffusing capacity, a marker of emphysema severity, were the predictors. Models were used to predict spirometric outcomes for a validation cohort of 60 emphysema patients referred for LVRS. Furthermore, the surgeon preoperatively estimated outcomes basedon all available clinical data but blinded to model predictions. Spirometric changes within 6 months following surgery were compared to predictions. Results: Median FEV(1) in the validation cohort increased from 0.69 to 1.00 liters (+41%), and FVC from 2.07 to 2.78 liters (+29%; p < 0.05 for changes). Lookup functions and logistic regression equations identified patients experiencing major increases in FEV(1) >/=300 ml and FVC >/=500 ml with an accuracy quantified by areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves of 0.72 to 0.76 (all areas >0.5, p < 0.05). Predictions by the surgeon had an accuracy of 0.71 to 0.78 (p = NS vs. models). Conclusions: The accuracy of models based on three predictors was fair and similar to assessment by an experienced surgeon based on all available clinical information. Prediction models may contribute to the consistent assessment of LVRS candidates. Copyright (c) 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.
机译:背景:肺减容术(LVRS)可改善部分严重肺气肿患者的症状和肺功能。目的:我们调查了基于生理和放射学预测因子的模型是否将对LVRS的肺活量测定反应较差的患者区分为好患者。方法:70例先前接受过LVRS的患者的派生队列的数据有助于建立两种类型的预测模型,即查找函数和逻辑回归方程。在1 s(FEV(1))> / = 300 ml和强制肺活量(FVC)> / = 500 ml的情况下,是否存在强制呼气量的改善代表两分结果。残余量/总肺活量比,CT放射学肺气肿异质性评分和弥散能力是肺气肿严重程度的标志。使用模型来预测60例接受LVRS治疗的肺气肿患者的肺活量测定结果。此外,外科医生会根据所有可用的临床数据进行术前评估结果,但对模型预测不了解。将术后6个月内的肺活量变化与预测值进行比较。结果:验证队列中的FEV(1)中位数从0.69升至1.00升(+41%),FVC从2.07升至2.78升(+ 29%;变化p <0.05)。查找功能和逻辑回归方程可确定患者的FEV(1)> / = 300 ml和FVC> / = 500 ml出现大幅增加,其准确度由接受者工作特征曲线下的面积0.72至0.76量化(所有面积> 0.5) ,p <0.05)。外科医生的预测准确度为0.71至0.78(p = NS与模型相比)。结论:基于三个预测因子的模型的准确性是公平的,并且类似于经验丰富的外科医生根据所有可用的临床信息进行的评估。预测模型可能有助于对LVRS候选人进行一致的评估。版权所有(c)2004 S.Karger AG,巴塞尔。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号