...
首页> 外文期刊>Respiration: International Review of Thoracic Diseases >Randomized, double-blind study of prulifloxacin versus ciprofloxacin in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.
【24h】

Randomized, double-blind study of prulifloxacin versus ciprofloxacin in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

机译:普鲁沙星与环丙沙星在慢性支气管炎急性加重患者中的随机,双盲研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Recently the role of bacteria in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) as well as antibiotic treatment with selected drugs, especially fluoroquinolones, have been better defined. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety in patients with AECB of prulifloxacin in comparison with ciprofloxacin. METHODS: AECB was defined according to the guidelines for the evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of respiratory tract infections (1992). 235 patients took part in the trial; 117 (88 males and 29 females, mean age 64.8 years) received 600 mg prulifloxacin once daily and 118 (91 males and 27 females, mean age 64.5 years) 500 mg ciprofloxacin twice a day, for a duration of 10 days. The study design was randomized, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy. Efficacy evaluations were performed by comparing pretreatment and posttreatment assessments. The clinical response was determined by 4-point rating scores on cough, dyspnea, and expectoration (volume and appearance). The microbiological response was assessed on sputum specimen. RESULTS: Clinical success was observed in 84.7 and 85% of patients in the prulifloxacin and ciprofloxacin groups, respectively. The 95% confidence interval proved the equivalence of treatments. Both drugs successfully eradicated the most commonly isolated strains, including Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Both treatments were well tolerated. Adverse drug reactions were always of mild or moderate intensity. CONCLUSION: The study showed that a 10-day course of prulifloxacin is as effective and safe as ciprofloxacin in the treatment of patients with AECB. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:背景:最近,细菌在慢性支气管炎(AECB)急性加重中的作用以及用选定药物(尤其是氟喹诺酮类药物)进行的抗生素治疗已得到更好的定义。目的:评估普鲁沙星与环丙沙星相比对AECB患者的疗效和安全性。方法:根据评估用于治疗呼吸道感染的新型抗感染药的指南(1992年)定义AECB。 235名患者参加了试验; 117名(88名男性和29名女性,平均年龄64.8岁)每天接受600 mg普鲁沙星治疗; 118名(91名男性和27名女性,平均年龄64.5岁)每天接受500 mg环丙沙星治疗,持续10天。研究设计为随机,多中心,双盲,双假人。通过比较治疗前和治疗后评估进行疗效评估。临床反应由对咳嗽,呼吸困难和咳痰(量和外观)的4分制评分决定。在痰标本上评估微生物反应。结果:普利沙星和环丙沙星组分别有84.7和85%的患者获得临床成功。 95%的置信区间证明了治疗的等效性。两种药物均成功消灭了最常见的分离株,包括流感嗜血杆菌,肺炎链球菌,肺炎克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌。两种治疗均耐受良好。药物不良反应总是轻度或中度。结论:该研究表明,普鲁沙星治疗患者AECB的10天疗程与环丙沙星一样安全有效。版权所有2002 S. Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号