...
首页> 外文期刊>Resources, Conservation and Recycling >Life cycle energy and material flow implications of gypsum plasterboard recycling in the European Union
【24h】

Life cycle energy and material flow implications of gypsum plasterboard recycling in the European Union

机译:欧盟石膏石膏板回收的生命周期能量和物料流影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Turning waste into a resource is a way to increase resource use efficiency and close the material loop of a circular economy. Gypsum plasterboard is well suited for this, because the raw material calcium sulphate dihydrate (CaSO4 center dot 2H(2)O) can repeatedly change its properties through a reversible hydration reaction. The waste hierarchy is applied when plasterboard is recycled instead of landfilled, which contributes to the European 2020 target of 70% recovery of construction and demolition (C&D) waste, as defined in the Directive 2008/98/EC on Waste. This paper evaluates the energy and climate impacts of different levels of plasterboard recycling. First, we formulate a life cycle model of gypsum mass flows in the European Union (EU-27) in the reference year 2013. This model constitutes the basis of the quantitative scenario analysis. Secondly, we assess the material flows, energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in different recycling scenarios. We compare the current situation ("2013 base case") to two scenarios: a worst case scenario of 0% recycled gypsum ("Zero recycling case"), and a best case scenario of zero gypsum waste sent to landfill, corresponding to 18.7% recycled gypsum in new plasterboard ("High recycling case"). We find no significant variation between scenarios in terms of life cycle energy use, as lower impacts from gypsum mining, transport of natural gypsum and final disposal in the best case scenario are balanced by the energy for the transport of plasterboard waste and recycled gypsum and for material pre-processing during manufacturing. In contrast, life cycle GHG emissions are lower as recycling increases, largely driven by the degradation of plasterboard lining paper in landfills. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:将废物转化为资源是一种提高资源利用效率并关闭循环经济物质循环的方法。石膏石膏板非常适合此用途,因为原料二水合硫酸钙(CaSO4中心点2H(2)O)可以通过可逆的水合反应反复改变其性质。废物等级是在石膏板被回收而不是填埋时应用的,这有助于实现欧洲2020年的目标,如关于废物的指令2008/98 / EC中所定义的那样,回收70%的建筑和拆除(C&D)废物。本文评估了不同程度的石膏板回收利用对能源和气候的影响。首先,我们在基准年2013年制定了欧盟(EU-27)石膏质量流量的生命周期模型。该模型构成了定量情景分析的基础。其次,我们评估了不同回收方案下的物质流,能源使用和温室气体排放。我们将当前情况(“ 2013年基本案例”)与两种情况进行了比较:最坏的情况是回收石膏为0%(“零回收的情况”),最佳情况是将零石膏废物送入垃圾填埋场,相当于18.7%新石膏板中的再生石膏(“高回收率案例”)。在生命周期能源使用方面,我们发现方案之间没有显着差异,因为在最佳情况下,石膏开采,天然石膏的运输和最终处置的较低影响受到石膏板废物和再生石膏的运输能量以及制造过程中的材料预处理。相反,随着回收利用的增加,生命周期内的温室气体排放量会降低,这在很大程度上是由垃圾填埋场中石膏板衬纸的降解引起的。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号