首页> 外文期刊>Resources policy >A jurisdictional maturity model for risk management, accountability and continual improvement of abandoned mine remediation programs
【24h】

A jurisdictional maturity model for risk management, accountability and continual improvement of abandoned mine remediation programs

机译:辖区成熟度模型,用于风险管理,问责制和对废弃矿山整治计划的持续改进

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abandoned mines can pose risks to the natural environment, humans and economies and prevent multiple or sequential uses of affected land. They range in size from individual shafts to large polluting open cut mines. Across Australia, there are over 50,000 abandoned mines on public and private land. A coordinated, effective management response is required to remediate these sites and reduce liabilities. We propose a novel maturity model for the evaluation of abandoned mine remediation programs and by applying it to Australian jurisdictions, demonstrate the potential for the model to be applied globally. The model incorporates 14 hierarchical evaluative criteria (including social, environmental and economic factors) which are each assessed against five performance indicators. These were derived from prior research and an Australian national policy for abandoned mines. We used the model to compare Australian jurisdictions to a leading practice benchmark jurisdiction, British Columbia, Canada, using web-accessible information and - in two cases - self-evaluation. The amount of publicly-available information varied widely between jurisdictions. Most Australian jurisdictions were ranked as less mature than the British Columbia program for most criteria. We then explain how the maturity model can be used to implement an existing regulatory framework specifically, the Australian Strategic Framework for Managing Abandoned Mines in the Minerals Industry, and discuss how the model can be applied to evaluate progress and prioritise improvements to abandoned mine management programs globally. A systematic approach to monitoring and evaluating abandoned mines programs is essential for improved accountability and to demonstrate change in liability over time. A systematic approach will also support shared learning and continual improvement within, and across, jurisdictions. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:遗弃的地雷可能对自然环境,人类和经济造成风险,并防止多次或顺序使用受灾土地。它们的大小不一,从单个竖井到大型污染露天矿。在整个澳大利亚,公共和私人土地上有50,000多个废弃的地雷。需要采取协调一致,有效的管理对策来补救这些地点并减少负债。我们提出了一种新的成熟度模型,用于评估废弃的矿山整治计划,并将其应用于澳大利亚司法管辖区,展示了该模型在全球范围内应用的潜力。该模型包含14个等级评估标准(包括社会,环境和经济因素),每个评估标准均根据5个绩效指标进行评估。这些来自先前的研究和澳大利亚针对废弃矿山的国家政策。我们使用该模型,通过可访问网络的信息以及两种情况下的自我评估,将澳大利亚的司法管辖区与领先的实践基准司法管辖区(加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省)进行了比较。不同地区之间公开可用的信息量差异很大。在大多数情况下,大多数澳大利亚司法管辖区的排名都比不列颠哥伦比亚省计划的成熟度低。然后,我们将解释如何使用成熟度模型来具体实施现有的监管框架,即《澳大利亚矿产行业中管理废弃矿山的战略框架》,并讨论如何将该模型用于评估进度并优先考虑对废弃矿山管理计划的改进全球范围。对于改善问责制和证明责任随时间的变化,系统性的监测和评估废弃地雷方案的方法至关重要。一种系统的方法还将支持在辖区内和跨辖区的共同学习和持续改进。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号