...
首页> 外文期刊>Remediation: The Journal of Environmental Cleanup Costs, Technologies & Techniques >A Critique of Estimating Future Costs Using Most Likely Value
【24h】

A Critique of Estimating Future Costs Using Most Likely Value

机译:使用最可能的价值估算未来成本的批评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ASTM E2137 (Standard Guide for Estimating Monetary Costs and Liability for Environmental Matters, or E2137) is the guidance for developing estimates of future environmental costs. E2137 provides a hierarchy of cost estimation approaches, and expresses an explicit preference for the use of probabilistic cost analysis to develop expected values for environmental costs. Dr. Ram and his colleagues have published an article (Remediation Journal, Autumn 2013) which rejects the use of EV analysis, arguing that while "good in principle" it has little practical value because it is nearly impossible to develop supportable probabilities. The E2137 principles and processes have been used for more than a decade in the context of addressing future environmental costs, yet their view of E2137 renders the standard meaningless. We conclude that the deficiency is not in the ASTM standard, and that when properly constructed, probabilistic analyses can be used to develop expected values with supportable probabilities.
机译:ASTM E2137(估算环境成本的货币成本和责任标准指南,或E2137)是制定未来环境成本估算的指南。 E2137提供了成本估算方法的层次结构,并明确表示愿意使用概率成本分析来开发环境成本的期望值。 Ram博士和他的同事发表了一篇文章(Remediation Journal,2013年秋季),该文章拒绝使用EV分析,并认为尽管“原则上良好”,但几乎没有实用价值,因为几乎不可能得出可支持的概率。 E2137的原理和过程在解决未来环境成本方面已经使用了十多年,但是他们对E2137的看法使该标准毫无意义。我们得出的结论是,该缺陷不在ASTM标准中,并且当正确构建时,可以使用概率分析来得出具有可支持概率的期望值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号