...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiotherapy and oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology >A pilot study of accelerated preoperative hyperfractionated pelvic irradiation with or without low-dose preoperative prophylactic liver irradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
【24h】

A pilot study of accelerated preoperative hyperfractionated pelvic irradiation with or without low-dose preoperative prophylactic liver irradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

机译:局部晚期直肠癌患者术前加速超分割盆腔放疗(有或没有小剂量预防性肝照射)的初步研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of low-dose preoperative prophylactic liver irradiation (PLI) combined with preoperative accelerated hyperfractionated pelvic irradiation (HART) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1999 and 2003 62 patients were enrolled: 38 (61%) received HART and 24 (39%) HART+PLI. The pelvis was irradiated twice a day, with a minimal interfraction interval of 6h: the total dose of 42Gy was given in 1.5Gy per fractions over 18 days. The PLI (14Gy in 10 daily fractions of 1.4Gy) was given simultaneously with the morning fraction of HART. Twenty patients (32%), including 7 in PLI group, received 5-Fu based postoperative chemotherapy. RESULTS: In general, acute normal tissue reactions appeared tolerable irrespectively of PLI. Six to twelve months after completion of combined therapy the mean ALAT levels in patients treated with HART alone (25 pts), HART+chemotherapy (13 pts), HART+PLI (17 pts), and HART+PLI+chemotherapy (7 pts) were 15, 21, 26 and 55IU/l, respectively. A mild increase of ALAT levels observed in the HART+PLI+chemotherapy sub-group was non-symptomatic. Three-year actuarial loco-regional control rate in a group of 62 patients was 94%. None of the patients who received PLI developed metastases during the follow-up, compared to 10 out of 38 patients (26%) with no PLI. A difference in metastases-free survival in favor of HART+PLI can be, however, attributed to selection of patients for PLI who were in better general health and stage of disease than those treated with HART. CONCLUSIONS: Further use of PLI may be limited due to asymptomatic, but detectable biochemical changes of liver function when PLI is sequentially combined with chemotherapy. HART, on the other hand, provides acceptable rate of local control, and is well tolerated, also when combined with postoperative chemotherapy.
机译:背景与目的:评价低剂量术前预防性肝照射(PLI)结合术前加速超分割骨盆放疗(HART)在局部晚期直肠癌患者中的可行性。患者与方法:1999年至2003年之间,共有62例患者入组:38例(61%)接受了HART,24例(39%)接受了HART + PLI。每天对骨盆照射两次,最小间隔时间为6h:42Gy的总剂量在18天内以每部分1.5Gy的剂量给药。 PLI(14Gy,每天10次,每日1.4Gy)与HART早晨同时给予。 20例患者(32%),包括PLI组中的7例,接受了基于5-Fu的术后化疗。结果:总体而言,急性正常组织反应似乎与PLI无关。联合治疗完成后六至十二个月,单独接受HART(25分),HART +化学疗法(13分),HART + PLI(17分)和HART + PLI +化学疗法(7分)的患者的平均ALAT水平分别为15、21、26和55IU / l。在HART + PLI +化学疗法亚组中观察到的ALAT轻度升高是无症状的。 62例患者的三年精算局部区域控制率为94%。随访期间,接受PLI的患者均未发生转移,相比之下,未接受PLI的38位患者中有10位(26%)。然而,支持HART + PLI的无转移生存率的差异可以归因于选择的PLI患者的总体健康状况和疾病分期比接受HART治疗的患者更好。结论:PLI的进一步使用可能受到限制,因为当PLI顺序与化学疗法联合使用时,其无症状但可检测到肝功能的生化变化。另一方面,当与术后化疗联合使用时,HART可提供可接受的局部控制率,并且耐受性良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号