首页> 外文期刊>Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology: RTP >Signal detection of methylphenidate by comparing a spontaneous reporting database with a claims database.
【24h】

Signal detection of methylphenidate by comparing a spontaneous reporting database with a claims database.

机译:通过比较自发报告数据库和索赔数据库来检测哌醋甲酯的信号。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Data mining is critical for signal detection in pharmacovigilance systems. In this study, we compared signals between spontaneous reporting data and health insurance claims data for a socially issued drug, methylphenidate. We implemented data-mining tools for signal detection in both databases: Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratios (PRR), Chi-squared test, and Information Component (IC), in addition to a Relative Risk (RR) tool in the claims database. The claims database generated 15, 15, 36, 1, and 1 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by ROR, PRR, chi-square, IC, and RR, respectively. The World Health Organization (WHO) spontaneous database generated 91, 91, 137, and 96 ADRs by ROR, PRR, chi-square, and IC, respectively. We found seven potential matching associations from the claims and WHO databases, but only one of them was present in the Korean spontaneous reporting database. In Korea, spontaneous reporting is still underreported and there is a small amount of data for Koreans. Signal comparison between the claims and WHO databases can provide additional regulatory insight.
机译:数据挖掘对于药物警戒系统中的信号检测至关重要。在这项研究中,我们比较了自发报告数据和社会发行的药物哌醋甲酯的健康保险理赔数据之间的信号。除了两个数据库中的相对风险(RR)工具外,我们还在两个数据库中实施了数据挖掘工具来进行信号检测:报告赔率(ROR),比例报告率(PRR),卡方检验和信息成分(IC)。索赔数据库。索赔数据库分别通过ROR,PRR,卡方,IC和RR生成了15、15、36、1和1个药品不良反应(ADR)。世界卫生组织(WHO)自发数据库分别通过ROR,PRR,卡方和IC生成了91、91、137和96种ADR。我们从索赔和WHO数据库中发现了七个潜在的匹配协会,但在韩国自发报告数据库中仅存在其中一个。在韩国,自发报告仍被低估,韩国人的数据很少。索赔与WHO数据库之间的信号比较可以提供更多的法规依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号