...
首页> 外文期刊>Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology: RTP >Potential confounding effects of benzyl alcohol as a formulation excipient support the elimination of the abnormal toxicity test from pharmacopoeias
【24h】

Potential confounding effects of benzyl alcohol as a formulation excipient support the elimination of the abnormal toxicity test from pharmacopoeias

机译:苄醇作为制剂赋形剂的潜在混杂效应,可消除药典中异常毒性试验的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Benzyl alcohol is an excipient used in many drugs as a stabilizer. Depending on the amount present in drug formulations there might be confounding findings in the Abnormal Toxicity Test (ATT). The NIT is utilized as a quality control (QC) release test to detect extraneous contaminants according to national pharmacopoeias. Our study assessed the effects of benzyl alcohol as defined in ATT designs. This study - the first thorough evaluation of the confounding effects of benzyl alcohol on the ATT - was conducted in relation to particular health authority questions and was part of the root-cause analyses resulting from some transient behavioral findings observed in the test. Two strains of mice, CD-1 & Kunming, plus Hartley guinea pigs were administered intraperitoneally (ip), subcutaneously (sc), or intravenously (iv) with benzyl alcohol at dose level defined in the ATT design. In both mice and guinea pigs, only after ip administration, minimal behavioral changes were observed transiently within 2-3 min after administration. Therefore, the presence of benzyl alcohol in the product batch may confound the ATT results. This study provides further evidence to question the validity of the ATT for its intended use. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:苯甲醇是许多药物中用作稳定剂的赋形剂。根据药物制剂中的含量,可能会在异常毒性试验(ATT)中发现一些令人困惑的发现。根据国家药典,将NIT用作质量控制(QC)释放测试,以检测外部污染物。我们的研究评估了ATT设计中定义的苯甲醇的影响。这项研究是对苯甲醇对ATT的混杂影响进行的首次彻底评估,是针对特定的卫生当局问题进行的,并且是在测试中观察到的一些瞬时行为发现所导致的根本原因分析的一部分。以ATT设计中定义的剂量水平,分别用苯甲醇腹膜内(ip),皮下(sc)或静脉内(iv)施用两种小鼠品系CD-1和昆明,再加上Hartley豚鼠。在小鼠和豚鼠中,仅在腹膜内施用后,在施用后2-3分钟内瞬时观察到最小的行为变化。因此,产品批次中存在苯甲醇可能会混淆ATT结果。这项研究提供了进一步的证据来质疑ATT预期用途的有效性。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号