首页> 外文期刊>Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology: RTP >Linear No-Threshold model and standards for protection against radiation
【24h】

Linear No-Threshold model and standards for protection against radiation

机译:线性无阈值模型和辐射防护标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In response to the three petitions by Carol S. Marcus, Mark L Miller, and Mohan Doss, dated February 9, February 13, and February 24, 2015, respectively, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) has announced that it is considering assessing its choice of dose response model, the Linear No Threshold (LNT) model, for exposure to ionizing radiation. This comment is designed to assist the Commission in evaluating the merits of a review of the default dose response model it uses as the basis for the Standards for Protection against Radiation regulations. It extends the petitioners' argument in favor of reexamining the default hypothesis (LNT) and taking consideration of low-dose hormesis for two main reasons: 1) Failure to review the LNT hypothesis may jeopardize the NRC's mission to protect public health and safety; and 2) The National Research Council's guidelines for choosing adequate defaults indicate that the choice of low-dose default model is due for a reevaluation. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:针对Carol S.Marcus,Mark L Miller和Mohan Doss分别于2015年2月9日,2月13日和2月24日发出的三份请愿书,核监管委员会(NRC或该委员会)宣布考虑评估其选择的剂量反应模型,即线性无阈值(LNT)模型,以暴露于电离辐射。该意见旨在帮助委员会评估对默认剂量反应模型进行审核的优劣,该模型用作防辐射标准法规的基础。它扩大了请愿人的论点,支持重新审查默认假说(LNT)并考虑低剂量的兴奋剂,其主要原因有两个:1)如果不审查LNT假说,可能会损害NRC保护公众健康和安全的使命; 2)美国国家研究委员会(National Research Council)选择适当默认值的指南表明,应重新评估选择低剂量默认值模型。 (C)2016 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号