首页> 外文期刊>Liver international : >Beta-blockers in portal hypertension: New developments and controversies
【24h】

Beta-blockers in portal hypertension: New developments and controversies

机译:β-受体阻滞剂治疗门脉高压症的新进展和争议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There are many studies investigating the role of non-selective beta-blockers in portal hypertension. Satisfactory reduction in portal pressure is possible in a third to half of patients with propranolol and nadolol, although combining these drugs with nitrates may be more effective. Carvedilol is a more potent agent than propranolol in reducing portal pressure, particularly in non-responders, and is better tolerated. All these drugs have been studied in primary and secondary prophylaxis, sometimes in combination with band ligation and/or nitrates. There is some evidence to support combining these agents with band ligation, despite a lack of survival benefit and increased adverse events. Hemodynamic monitoring can help select non-responders who may benefit from additional therapies such as band ligation, as lack of response is associated with worse outcomes. Propranolol should be used with caution in patients with refractory ascites, although the current evidence is not of sufficient quality to justify not using these drugs in such situations. Beta-blockers have been shown to reduce bacterial translocation and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis.
机译:有许多研究调查非选择性β受体阻滞剂在门脉高压症中的作用。普萘洛尔和纳多洛尔有三分之一至一半的患者可以使门脉压力令人满意地降低,尽管将这些药物与硝酸盐组合可能更有效。卡维地洛在降低门静脉压力方面比普萘洛尔更有效,尤其是在无反应者中,并且耐受性更好。所有这些药物已在一级和二级预防中进行了研究,有时结合了带结扎和/或硝酸盐。尽管缺乏生存益处并增加了不良事件,但有一些证据支持将这些药物与带结扎术结合使用。血流动力学监测可以帮助选择无反应者,这些反应者可能会从其他治疗(例如带结扎)中受益,因为缺乏反应会导致不良预后。普萘洛尔在顽固性腹水患者中应谨慎使用,尽管当前证据不足以证明在这种情况下不使用这些药物。已经证明,β受体阻滞剂可以减少肝硬化中的细菌移位和自发性细菌性腹膜炎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号