...
首页> 外文期刊>Reproductive biomedicine online >Outcomes of natural cycles versus programmed cycles for 1677 frozen-thawed embryo transfers.
【24h】

Outcomes of natural cycles versus programmed cycles for 1677 frozen-thawed embryo transfers.

机译:自然周期与程序化周期的结果,涉及1677次冻融的胚胎移植。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The study compares outcomes for patients with frozen embryos who had frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) timed to their natural ovulation cycle versus cycles in which endometrial timing was programmed with oestrogen and progesterone. A total of 1205 patients undergoing 1677 FET cycles between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2006 were analysed. Comparisons were made for patients undergoing modified natural versus programmed FET cycles, as well as between patients using their own eggs for frozen embryos versus those using donor-egg-derived embryos. Clinical pregnancy (gestational sac on 7 week ultrasound) rates (CPR), as well as miscarriage rates, were significantly higher in programmed FET cycles in patients using their own eggs (106/262, 40.5% per embryo transfer, P = 0.015) However, there was not a difference in delivered pregnancies between cycle types in own egg patients (natural cycle delivery rate 245/862, 28.4%; programmed cycle delivery rate 77/262, 29.4%). Furthermore, CPR were not different in natural (38/129, 29.5%) versus programmed cycles (144/424, 34.0%) for ovum donor recipients, nor were delivered pregnancy rates different in natural (33/129, 25.6%) versus programmed cycles (114/424, 26.9%) for ovum donor recipients. In conclusion, there is no significant difference in delivery rates for FET in natural (278/991, 28.1%) versus programmed (191/686, 27.8%) cycles using both own embryos and donor-egg-derived embryos.
机译:这项研究比较了具有自然融卵周期的冻融胚胎移植(FET)的冷冻胚胎患者的结局与使用雌激素和孕激素设定子宫内膜正时的周期的结果。分析了2000年1月1日至2006年12月31日期间共进行了1677个FET周期的1205例患者。比较了经历改良的自然和程序FET循环的患者,以及使用自己的卵用于冷冻胚胎的患者与使用供体卵来源的胚胎的患者之间的比较。使用自己的卵的患者在程序化的FET周期中,临床妊娠(7周超声检查中的胎囊)率和流产率显着更高(106/262,每次胚胎移植40.5%,P = 0.015) ,在自己的鸡蛋患者中,不同周期类型的孕妇分娩的妊娠率没有差异(自然周期分娩率245/862,28.4%;程序性分娩率77/262,29.4%)。此外,卵子捐献者的自然CPR(38/129,29.5%)与计划周期(144/424,34.0%)均无差异,自然(33/129,25.6%)与计划的妊娠率也无差异卵子供体接受者的周期(114 / 424,26.9%)。总之,在使用自己的胚胎和供体卵衍生的胚胎的自然周期(278 / 991,28.1%)与程序化周期(191 / 686,27.8%)中,FET的递送率没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号