...
首页> 外文期刊>Research in science education >Do students know What they know and what they don't know? Using a four-tier diagnostic test to assess the nature of students' alternative conceptions
【24h】

Do students know What they know and what they don't know? Using a four-tier diagnostic test to assess the nature of students' alternative conceptions

机译:学生知道他们知道什么和不知道什么吗?使用四层诊断测试评估学生替代观念的性质

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study reports on the development and application of a four-tier multiple-choice (4TMC) diagnostic instrument, which has not been reported in the literature. It is an enhanced version of the two-tier multiple-choice (2TMC) test. As in 2TMC tests, its answer and reason tiers measure students' content knowledge and explanatory knowledge, respectively. The two additional tiers measure the level of confidence of students in the correctness of their chosen options for the answer and reason tiers respectively. The 4TMC diagnostic test focused on the properties and propagation of mechanical waves. It was administered to 598 upper secondary students after they were formally instructed on the foregoing topics. The vast majority of the respondents were found to have an inadequate grasp of the topics tested. Mean scores and mean confidence associated with the answer tier was higher than those associated with the reason tier. The students tended to be poorly discriminating between what they know and what they do not know. Familiarity with the topic tested was associated with greater percentage of students giving correct answers, higher confidence, and better discrimination quotient. Nine genuine alternative conceptions (which were expressed with moderate levels of confidence by students) were identified.
机译:这项研究报告了四层多选(4TMC)诊断仪器的开发和应用,但文献中尚未对此进行报道。它是两层多项选择(2TMC)测试的增强版本。与2TMC测试一样,其答案层和原因层分别衡量学生的内容知识和解释性知识。这两个附加等级分别用于衡量学生对答案等级和原因等级所选择选项的正确性的信心水平。 4TMC诊断测试的重点是机械波的特性和传播。在对上述主题进行正式指导后,将其管理给598名高中学生。发现绝大多数受访者对所测试的主题没有足够的了解。与答案层相关的平均分数和平均置信度高于与原因层相关的平均分数和平均置信度。学生们往往很难区分他们知道的和不知道的。熟悉所测试的主题会带来更多的学生提供正确答案,更高的置信度和更好的歧视商。确定了九个真正的替代概念(学生以中等信心水平表达了这些概念)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号