首页> 外文期刊>R & D Management: Research and Development Management >Working with concepts in the fuzzy front end: exploring the context for innovation for different types of concepts at Volvo Cars
【24h】

Working with concepts in the fuzzy front end: exploring the context for innovation for different types of concepts at Volvo Cars

机译:在模糊的前端中使用概念:探索沃尔沃汽车不同类型概念的创新环境

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Automotive firms are balancing the increasing needs for cost and time efficiency with the necessity of developing more innovative products to stand out on in a competitive market. The strive for efficiency has led to an increasingly structured development process with limited allowances for deviations. Previous academic work has pointed out the importance and embedded potential of the fuzzy front end, where new concepts still have the possibility to impact the new product development (NPD) process. However, most research has focused on the transfer of new technologies, while concepts based on e.g. customer or market knowledge have been more or less neglected. This paper discusses the need for alternative and contingent approaches in the front end of NPD to also consider the transfer of other types of concepts. More specifically, it addresses the need to distinguish between different types of concepts and to explore their different prerequisites in NPD. It is argued that customer- and market-based concepts experience certain difficulties due to the history and power of technology in research and development (R&D) domains in the automotive context as well as a lack of support from the existing, formal processes. In this paper, we argue that all new concepts need to be conceptualized before being introduced to the NPD process, but that does not always suffice. Concepts other than technology concepts also need a contingent package to enable an evaluation in the context of the R&D process - they need to be contextualized. This paper draws on an in-depth case study of Volvo Cars within a long-lasting collaborative research setup. It is based on an interview study with key persons in the areas of concept work and NPD, and uses an insider/outsider approach.
机译:汽车公司在不断增长的成本和时间效率需求与开发更具创新性的产品以在竞争激烈的市场中脱颖而出的需求之间取得平衡。为提高效率而进行的努力已导致结构化的开发过程日益增多,偏差的限制也很有限。先前的学术工作指出了模糊前端的重要性和内在潜力,其中新概念仍然有可能影响新产品开发(NPD)流程。但是,大多数研究都集中在新技术的转让上,而基于客户或市场知识或多或少被忽略了。本文讨论了在NPD前端采用替代和偶然方法的必要性,以考虑其他类型概念的转移。更具体地说,它解决了区分不同类型的概念并探索它们在NPD中的不同先决条件的需求。有人认为,基于客户和市场的概念会遇到某些困难,这是由于汽车领域的研究和开发(R&D)领域中技术的历史和力量,以及缺乏现有正式流程的支持。在本文中,我们认为所有新概念在引入NPD流程之前都需要进行概念化,但这并不总是足够的。除技术概念之外的其他概念还需要一个临时的软件包,以便能够在R&D流程的上下文中进行评估-它们需要进行上下文化。本文利用长期合作研究中的沃尔沃汽车的深入案例研究。它基于与概念工作和NPD领域的关键人物的访谈研究,并使用内部人员/外部人员方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号