...
首页> 外文期刊>Research in developmental disabilities >Behavior problems: differences among intellectually disabled adults with co-morbid autism spectrum disorders and epilepsy.
【24h】

Behavior problems: differences among intellectually disabled adults with co-morbid autism spectrum disorders and epilepsy.

机译:行为问题:患有并存自闭症谱系障碍和癫痫病的智障成年人之间的差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Behavior problems such as aggression, property destruction, stereotypy, self-injurious behavior, and other disruptive behavior are commonly observed among adults with intellectual disabilities (ID), autism spectrum disorders (ASD), and epilepsy residing at state-run facilities. However, it is unknown how these populations differ on behavior problem indicies. Assessment of behavior problems were made with the ASD-behavior problems-adult version battery. One hundred participants with ID were matched and compared across four equal groups comprising 25 participants with ID, 25 participants with epilepsy, 25 participants with ASD, and 25 participants with combined ASD and epilepsy. When controlling for age, gender, race, level of ID, and hearing and visual impairments, significant differences were found among the four groups, Wilks's Lambda=.79, F(12, 246)=1.93, p<.05. The multivariate eta2 based on Wilks's Lambda was .08. A one-way ANOVA was conducted for each of the four subscales of the ASD-BPA as follow-up tests to the MANOVA. Groups differed on the aggression/destruction subscale, F(3, 96)=.79, p>.05, eta2=.03, and stereotypy subscale, F(3, 96)=2.62, p>.05, eta2=.08. No significant differences were found on the self-injury subscale and disruptive behavior subscale. Trend analysis demonstrated that individuals with ID expressing combined co-morbid ASD and epilepsy were significantly more impaired than the control group (ID only) or groups containing only a single co-morbid factor with ID (ASD or epilepsy only) on these four subscales. Implications of these findings in the context of known issues in ID, epilepsy, and ASD, current assessment practices among these populations and associated challenges are discussed.
机译:在患有智力障碍(ID),自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和居住在国有机构中的癫痫病的成年人中,通常会观察到诸如侵略,财产破坏,刻板印象,自残行为和其他破坏性行为等行为问题。但是,尚不清楚这些人群在行为问题指标上有何不同。使用ASD行为问题成人电池对行为问题进行了评估。在四个相等的组中对一百名具有ID的参与者进行匹配和比较,包括25名具有ID的参与者,25名患有癫痫的参与者,25名患有ASD的参与者以及25名患有ASD和癫痫合并症的参与者。当控制年龄,性别,种族,ID水平以及听觉和视觉障碍时,四组之间的差异显着,威尔克斯Lambda = .79,F(12,246)= 1.93,p <.05。基于Wilks的Lambda的多元eta2为0.08。对ASD-BPA的四个子量表中的每一个量表均进行了单向ANOVA,作为MANOVA的后续测试。各组在攻击/破坏子量表上不同,F(3,96)=。79,p> .05,eta2 = .03,和刻板印象子量表上,F(3,96)= 2.62,p> .05,eta2 =。 08。在自伤子量表和破坏性行为子量表上未发现显着差异。趋势分析表明,在这四个子量表上,具有ID的合并表达合并病态ASD和癫痫病的个体比对照组(仅ID)或仅包含具有ID的单一合并病因子(ASD或癫痫病)的组受损害更大。讨论了这些发现在ID,癫痫和ASD的已知问题中的含义,这些人群中当前的评估实践以及相关的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号