首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of medicine and philosophy >Phenomenology of Illness and the Need for a More Comprehensive Approach: Lessons from a Discussion of Plato's Charmides
【24h】

Phenomenology of Illness and the Need for a More Comprehensive Approach: Lessons from a Discussion of Plato's Charmides

机译:疾病现象学和对更全面方法的需求:柏拉图的《理想国》讨论的教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Phenomenology informs a number of contemporary attempts to give more weight to the lived experience of patients and overcome the limitations of a one-sidedly biomedical understanding of illness. Susan Bredlau has recently presented a reading of Plato's dialogue Charmides, which portrays Socrates as a pioneer of the phenomeno-logical approach to illness. I use a critical discussion of Bredlau's interpretation of the Charmides to show that the phenomenology of illness also has its shortcomings and needs to be complemented by still other approaches. While Bredlau does make a number of highly apt and relevant suggestions as to how a narrow biomedical approach to illness may be corrected, some (but not all) of which are related to phenomenology, the attribution to Plato's Socrates of a phenomenological approach is mistaken. Characteristically, Socrates shows little interest in the personal experience of a patient. He is more concerned with the patient's lifestyle and conduct and so suggests an alternative or complementary perspective, stressing the importance of education and prevention to health care.
机译:现象学为许多当代尝试提供了信息,这些尝试更加重视患者的生活体验,并克服了对疾病的片面生物医学理解的局限性。苏珊·布雷德劳(Susan Bredlau)最近对柏拉图的对话《查米德斯》(Charmides)进行了解读,该对话将苏格拉底描绘成现象学疾病方法的先驱。我用对布莱德劳对查米德斯的解释的批判性讨论来表明,疾病现象学也有其缺点,需要用其他方法来补充。虽然布莱德劳确实就如何纠正狭隘的生物医学方法提出了许多非常恰当和相关的建议,其中一些(但不是全部)与现象学有关,但将现象学方法归因于柏拉图的苏格拉底是错误的。典型的是,苏格拉底对病人的个人经历兴趣不大。他更关心患者的生活方式和行为,因此提出了另一种或补充的观点,强调教育和预防对医疗保健的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号