...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Percutaneous self-expanding metal stents versus endoscopic polyethylene endoprostheses for treating malignant biliary obstruction: randomized clinical trial.
【24h】

Percutaneous self-expanding metal stents versus endoscopic polyethylene endoprostheses for treating malignant biliary obstruction: randomized clinical trial.

机译:经皮自膨式金属支架与内窥镜聚乙烯假体治疗恶性胆道梗阻:随机临床试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare percutaneous self-expanding metal stents with conventional endoscopic polyethylene endoprostheses for treatment of malignant biliary obstruction by means of a prospective randomized clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with biliary obstruction due to inoperable primary carcinoma of the pancreas, gallbladder, or bile ducts or regional lymph node metastases were included. Evaluated outcomes included technical and therapeutic success rates, morbidity and 30-day mortality rates, hospital stay length and readmission, biliary reobstruction, and overall survival rates. Data were analyzed according to both the intention-to-treat principle and the treatment actually administered. Univariate (Kaplan-Meier method) and multivariate (Cox model) analyses were performed. RESULTS: After randomization, 28 patients were assigned to receive a percutaneous self-expanding metal stent and 26 patients to receive a 12-F endoscopic polyethylene prosthesis. The technical success rates of both implantation procedures were similar (percutaneous, 75% [21 of 28 patients]; endoscopic, 58% [15 of 26 patients]; P =.29), whereas therapeutic success was higher in the percutaneous group (71% [20 of 28 patients] vs 42% [11 of 26 patients]; P =.03). However, major complications were more common in the percutaneous group (61% [17 of 28 patients] vs 35% [nine of 26 patients]; P =.09) but did not account for differences in 30-day mortality rates (percutaneous, 36% [10 of 28 patients]; endoscopic, 42% [11 of 26 patients]; P =.83). Overall median survival was significantly higher in the percutaneous group than in the endoscopic group (3.7 vs 2.0 months; P =.02). Cox regression analysis enabled identification of placement of the percutaneous self-expanding metal stent as the only independent predictor of survival (relative risk, 2.19; 95% CI: 1.11, 4.31; P =.02). CONCLUSION: Placement of a percutaneous self-expanding metal stent is an alternative to placement of an endoscopic polyethylene endoprosthesis in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.
机译:目的:通过一项前瞻性随机临床试验,比较经皮自膨胀金属支架与常规内窥镜聚乙烯内膜假体治疗恶性胆道梗阻的方法。材料与方法:包括因无法手术的胰腺,胆囊或胆管癌或局部淋巴结转移引起的胆道梗阻患者。评估的结果包括技术和治疗成功率,发病率和30天死亡率,住院时间和再入院率,胆道再通和总生存率。根据意向治疗原则和实际进行的治疗对数据进行了分析。进行了单变量(Kaplan-Meier方法)和多变量(Cox模型)分析。结果:随机分组后,将28例患者分配为经皮自膨胀金属支架,而26例患者分配为12-F内窥镜聚乙烯假体。两种植入方法的技术成功率相似(经皮,75%[28例患者中的21];内镜,58%[26例患者15]; P = .29),而经皮组的治疗成功率更高(71 %[28名患者中的20名] vs 42%[26名患者中的11名]; P = .03)。然而,经皮治疗组的主要并发症更为常见(61%[28名患者中的17名]与35%[26名患者中的9名]; P = .09),但未解释30天死亡率的差异(经皮, 36%[28名患者中的10名];内窥镜检查,42%[26名患者中的11名]; P = .83)。经皮组的总中位生存期明显高于内镜组(3.7 vs 2.0个月; P = .02)。 Cox回归分析能够确定经皮自膨胀金属支架的放置是存活率的唯一独立预测指标(相对风险,2.19; 95%CI:1.11、4.31; P = .02)。结论:在患有恶性胆道梗阻的患者中,放置经皮自扩张金属支架是放置内窥镜聚乙烯假体的替代选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号