...
首页> 外文期刊>Cell biochemistry and biophysics >Comparison of the Outcomes of Two Operational Methods Used for the Fixation of Calcaneal Fracture
【24h】

Comparison of the Outcomes of Two Operational Methods Used for the Fixation of Calcaneal Fracture

机译:两种固定方法治疗Fra骨骨折的效果比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study was aimed to compare the outcomes of two operational methods used for the fixation of calcaneal fracture, the open reduction using a plate and the minimally invasive cannulated screw fixations. Thus, we attempted to find out as to which of these fixation regimens was therapeutically superior by assessing improvement in the restoration of foot functioning and estimating the biochemical indices that reflect bone recovery. A total of 492 calcaneal fracture patients admitted in our hospital from February, 2008 to February, 2012 were selected for the study and randomly divided into two groups of 246 cases each. They were treated with either open reduction using a plate or minimally invasive cannulated screw fixation procedures. After the operations, patients were followed up for 2 years and the outcomes including functional restoration of calcaneus, the post-operational complications, and measure of the biochemical indicators of bone recovery were compared. The patients who underwent plate fixation procedure showed the excellent and good rate of 76.8 %. The minimally invasive cannulated screw fixation led to the excellent and good rate of 82.5 %. The angle, width, and height of calcaneus observed in the last follow-up were also improved significantly in the two groups (p < 0.05); however, these outcomes of the two techniques were not significantly different from each other (p > 0.05). The post-operative complications occurred with the rates of 14.2 and 4.9 % in the patients treated with the plate and the minimally invasive cannulated screw fixations, respectively. The length of stay and hospitalization costs in the plate fixation group were 9.16 +/- A 0.83 days and 12,639.74 +/- A 2,573.82 Chinese Yuan, respectively. In comparison, in cannulated screw fixation group, the length of hospital stay (7.03 +/- A 0.52 days) and its cost (6,795.01 +/- A 996.53 Chinese Yuan) were significantly lower. Serum bone alkaline phosphatase and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b levels measured at the last follow-up examination were significantly altered (p < 0.05) in the two groups. However, the difference between the outcomes of the two methods was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Plate screw and the cannulated screw fixations showed equally good therapeutic effect and significantly improved patients' mobility. However, the cannulated screw fixation was superior in terms of post-operative infection-free recovery and economical burden to the patients.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较两种用于固定跟骨骨折的手术方法,使用钢板的切开复位术和微创空心螺钉固定术的效果。因此,我们试图通过评估足功能恢复的改善并评估反映骨恢复的生化指标来找出哪种固定方案在治疗上更具优势。选择2008年2月至2012年2月在我院收治的492例跟骨骨折患者,随机分为两组,每组246例。使用钢板进行开放复位或采用微创空心螺钉固定治疗。手术后,对患者进行了2年的随访,比较了包括跟骨功能恢复,术后并发症以及骨恢复生化指标的测量结果。接受钢板固定手术的患者显示优良率为76.8%。微创空心螺钉固定术的优良率高达82.5%。在最后一次随访中观察到的跟骨的角度,宽度和高度在两组中也得到了显着改善(p <0.05)。但是,这两种技术的这些结果之间没有显着差异(p> 0.05)。钢板和微创空心螺钉固定治疗的患者术后并发症发生率分别为14.2%和4.9%。钢板固定组的住院时间和住院费用分别为9.16 +/- A 0.83天和12,639.74 +/- A 2,573.82人民币。相比之下,在空心螺钉固定组中,住院时间(7.03 +/- A 0.52天)和费用(6,795.01 +/- A 996.53人民币)显着降低。在上次随访检查中测得的两组血清骨碱性磷酸酶和抗酒石酸酸性磷酸酶5b的水平有显着变化(p <0.05)。但是,两种方法的结果之间的差异在统计学上并不显着(p> 0.05)。钢板螺钉和空心螺钉固定同样显示出良好的治疗效果,并显着改善了患者的活动能力。但是,空心螺钉固定在术后无感染的恢复和对患者的经济负担方面是优越的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号