首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Alternative input devices for efficient navigation of large CT angiography data sets.
【24h】

Alternative input devices for efficient navigation of large CT angiography data sets.

机译:替代输入设备,可有效导航大型CT血管造影数据集。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare devices for the task of navigating through large computed tomographic (CT) data sets at a picture archiving and communication system workstation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this study, and all subjects provided informed consent. Five radiologists were asked to find 25 different vascular targets in three CT angiography data sets (average number of sections, 1025) by using several devices (trackball, tablet, jog-shuttle wheel, and mouse). For each trial, the total time to acquire the targets (T1) was recorded. A secondary study in which 13 nonradiologists performed seven trials with an artificial target inserted at a random location in the same image data was also performed. For each trial, the following items were recorded: time until first target sighting (t2), time to manipulate the device after seeing the target, sections traversed during t2 (d1), time from first sight to target acquisition (t4), sections traversed during t4 (d2), and total trial time. Statistical analysis involved repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and pairwise comparisons. RESULTS: Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed that the device used had a significant (P < .05) effect on T1. Pairwise comparisons revealed that the trackball was significantly slower than the tablet (P < .05) and marginally slower than the jog-shuttle wheel (P < .10). Further repeated-measures ANOVA for each secondary outcome measure revealed significant differences between devices for all outcome measures (P < .005). Pairwise comparisons revealed the trackball to be significantly slower than the other devices in all measures (P < .05). The trackball was significantly (P < .05) more accurate than the other devices for d1 and d2. CONCLUSION: The trackball may not be the optimal device for navigation of large CT angiography data sets; the use of other existing devices may improve the efficiency of interpretation of these sets.
机译:用途:比较用于在图片存档和通信系统工作站中浏览大型计算机断层扫描(CT)数据集的任务的设备。材料与方法:机构审查委员会批准了本研究,所有受试者均提供了知情同意。要求五名放射科医生使用几种设备(轨迹球,平板电脑,飞轮和鼠标)在三个CT血管造影数据集(平均切片数1025)中找到25个不同的血管靶标。对于每个试验,记录获得目标的总时间(T1)。还进行了一项辅助研究,其中13名非放射线医生进行了7次试验,将人造靶标插入到同一图像数据中的随机位置。对于每个试验,记录以下项目:到第一次目击为止的时间(t2),看到目标后操纵设备的时间,在t2期间遍历的部分(d1),从第一次目击到获取目标的时间(t4),经过的部分在t4(d2)中,以及总试用时间。统计分析涉及方差重复测量分析(ANOVA)和成对比较。结果:重复测量方差分析表明,所使用的设备对T1有显着(P <.05)影响。成对比较显示,轨迹球明显比平板电脑慢(P <.05),略微慢于飞梭轮(P <.10)。每个次要结局指标的进一步重复测量方差分析显示,所有结局指标的设备之间存在显着差异(P <.005)。配对比较显示,在所有方面,轨迹球的运行速度均显着低于其他设备(P <.05)。对于d1和d2,轨迹球比其他设备的精度明显更高(P <.05)。结论:轨迹球可能不是导航大型CT血管造影数据集的最佳设备。使用其他现有设备可能会提高这些集合的解释效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号