...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Evaluation of off-the-shelf displays for use in the American Board of Radiology maintenance of certification examination.
【24h】

Evaluation of off-the-shelf displays for use in the American Board of Radiology maintenance of certification examination.

机译:用于美国放射学委员会维护认证检查的现成显示器的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare high-, mid-, and low-resolution off-the-shelf displays currently employed by commercial testing centers, in terms of visibility of lesion features needed to render a diagnostic decision when possible diagnoses are provided in a multiple-choice format during a maintenance of certification (MOC) examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Psychometrics Division of the American Board of Radiology (ABR) approved the studies (human subjects and HIPAA compliant). One study compared 1280 x 1024 displays with 1024 x 768 displays; the second, 1600 x 1200 with 1280 x 1024 displays. Images from nine subspecialties were used. In each study, observers viewed images twice-once on each display. Diagnoses were provided, and observers rated visibility of diagnostic features. RESULTS: Of 7977 data pairs analyzed in study 1, the 1024 and 1280 displays received the same ratings for 5726 data pairs (72% of the time), with the 1024 display receiving a higher rating for 679 data pairs (9% of thetime) and the 1280 receiving a higher rating for 1572 data pairs (19% of the time) (P < .0001). When rating differences existed, all subspecialties except nuclear medicine had significantly more high-visibility ratings with the 1280 display. Of 1090 data pairs analyzed in study 2, the 1280 and 1600 displays received the same ratings for 689 data pairs (63% of the time), with the 1280 receiving a higher rating for 162 data pairs (15% of the time) and the 1600 receiving a higher rating for 239 data pairs (22% of the time) (P = .0001). When rating differences existed, only cardiopulmonary and musculoskeletal images had significantly more high-visibility ratings with the 1600 display. CONCLUSION: For the ABR MOC examinations, 1280 x 1024 displays should be used, compared to 1024 x 768 displays; 1600 x 1200 displays may be necessary for some images. Good-quality images must be used on the examinations, so digital rather than digitized film images should be used to ensure high-quality images.
机译:目的:为了对多个测试场所当前需要使用的高分辨率,中分辨率和低分辨率的现成显示器进行前瞻性比较,以在做出多处可能的诊断时做出诊断决定所需的病变特征的可见性方面进行比较维护认证(MOC)考试期间的选择格式。材料与方法:美国放射学委员会(ABR)的心理计量学部门批准了这项研究(人类受试者和符合HIPAA要求)。一项研究将1280 x 1024显示器与1024 x 768显示器进行了比较;第二个是1600 x 1200和1280 x 1024的显示屏。使用了来自9个专业的图像。在每个研究中,观察者在每个显示器上观看图像两次。提供了诊断,观察者对诊断功能的可见性进行了评级。结果:在研究1中分析的7977个数据对中,1024个和1280个显示对5726个数据对具有相同的评级(72%的时间),而1024个显示对679个数据对具有较高的评级(9%的时间)并且1280在1572个数据对中获得更高的评级(19%的时间)(P <.0001)。当存在等级差异时,除核医学外,所有子专业在1280显示器上都具有更高的高可见度等级。在研究2中分析的1090个数据对中,1280和1600显示器获得689个数据对的相同评级(占63%的时间),而1280个显示器获得162个数据对的较高评级(占15%的时间),并且1600收到239个数据对的较高评级(22%的时间)(P = .0001)。当存在等级差异时,只有心肺和肌肉骨骼图像在1600显示屏上具有更高的可见度等级。结论:对于ABR MOC检查,应使用1280 x 1024显示器,而1024 x 768显示器应使用。对于某些图像,可能需要1600 x 1200的显示器。检查时必须使用高质量的图像,因此应使用数字胶片而不是数字化胶片图像来确保高质量的图像。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号