首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Diagnostic imaging of patients in a memory clinic: comparison of MR imaging and 64-detector row CT.
【24h】

Diagnostic imaging of patients in a memory clinic: comparison of MR imaging and 64-detector row CT.

机译:存储器诊所中患者的诊断成像:MR成像和64排CT扫描的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: To investigate the assessment of global cortical atrophy (GCA), medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA), and white matter changes (WMCs) in patients screened at a memory clinic with a 64-detector row computed tomography (CT) brain protocol, in comparison with the reference standard, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study protocol was approved by the local institutional review board. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Thirty patients (21 men, nine women; median age, 62 years) who presented to a memory clinic underwent 64-detector row CT and multisequence MR imaging of the brain on the same day. Three readers blinded to the clinical diagnosis assessed the resultant images. Images were presented in random order and scored for GCA, MTA, and WMC with published visual rating scales. Intermodality agreement between CT and MR imaging (intrareader agreement across both modalities), expressed by weighted kappa analysis, and interobserver agreement within each modality between readers (Kendall W test) were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, excellent intraobserver agreement between CT and MR imaging was observed for GCA (mean kappa, 0.83) and MTA (mean kappa, 0.88 and 0.86 on the left and right sides of the brain, respectively). There was substantial overall agreement concerning WMC (mean kappa, 0.79). For all three tested scales, interobserver variability was low and comparable for CT and MR imaging. CONCLUSION: Use of 64-detector row brain CT yields reliable information that is comparable with that obtained with MR imaging. Thus, multidetector row CT is a suitable diagnostic imaging tool in a memory clinic setting.
机译:目的:调查在64排行计算机断层扫描(CT)脑协议的记忆诊所筛查的患者中,评估其总体皮质萎缩(GCA),内侧颞叶萎缩(MTA)和白质变化(WMC)的评估,与参考标准相比,磁共振(MR)成像。材料与方法:研究方案经当地机构审查委员会批准。所有参与者均已获得书面知情同意。在同一天就诊的30例患者(21例男性,9例女性;中位年龄62岁)在64例行行CT和脑部多序列MR成像检查中就诊。三位对临床诊断不知情的读者评估了所得图像。图像以随机顺序显示,并使用已发布的视觉评分量表对GCA,MTA和WMC评分。评估了CT和MR成像之间的联运方式一致性(两种方式之间的阅读器内一致性)(通过加权kappa分析表示)以及阅读器之间的每种方式之间的观察者间一致性(Kendall W检验)。结果:总体而言,对于GCA(平均kappa,0.83)和MTA(平均kappa,在大脑的左侧和右侧,分别为0.88和0.86),在CT和MR成像之间观察到了极好的观察者一致性。关于WMC达成了实质性的总体共识(平均卡帕值为0.79)。对于所有三个测试量表,观察者间的变异性均较低,可与CT和MR成像相媲美。结论:使用64探测器行脑部CT可以产生与MR成像相当的可靠信息。因此,多探测器行CT是存储器诊所中合适的诊断成像工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号