...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Coronary artery calcium scoring does not add prognostic value to standard 64-section CT angiography protocol in low-risk patients suspected of having coronary artery disease.
【24h】

Coronary artery calcium scoring does not add prognostic value to standard 64-section CT angiography protocol in low-risk patients suspected of having coronary artery disease.

机译:对于怀疑患有冠状动脉疾病的低危患者,冠状动脉钙化评分不会增加标准的64层CT血管造影方案的预后价值。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic outcome of cardiac computed tomography (CT) for prediction of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in low-risk patients suspected of having coronary artery disease (CAD) and to explore the differential prognostic values of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring and coronary CT angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review committee approval and informed consent were obtained. In 4338 patients who underwent 64-section CT for evaluation of suspected CAD, both CAC scoring and CT angiography were concurrently performed by using standard scanning protocols. Follow-up clinical outcome data regarding composite MACEs were procured. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were developed to predict MACEs. Risk-adjusted models incorporated traditional risk factors for CAC scoring and coronary CT angiography. RESULTS: During the mean follow-up of 828 days +/- 380, there were 105 MACEs, for an event rate of 3%. The presence of obstructive CAD at coronary CT angiography had independent prognostic value, which escalated according to the number of stenosed vessels (P < .001). In the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, the superiority of coronary CT angiography to CAC scoring was demonstrated by a significantly greater area under the ROC curve (AUC) (0.892 vs 0.810, P < .001), whereas no significant incremental value for the addition of CAC scoring to coronary CT angiography was established (AUC = 0.892 for coronary CT angiography alone vs 0.902 with addition of CAC scoring, P = .198). CONCLUSION: Coronary CT angiography is better than CAC scoring in predicting MACEs in low-risk patients suspected of having CAD. Furthermore, the current standard multisection CT protocol (coronary CT angiography combined with CAC scoring) has no incremental prognostic value compared with coronary CT angiography alone. Therefore, in terms of determining prognosis, CAC scoring may no longer need to be incorporated in the cardiac CT protocol in this population.
机译:目的:评估心脏计算机断层扫描(CT)的预后,以预测疑似冠心病(CAD)的低危患者的主要不良心脏事件(MACE),并探讨冠状动脉钙化的不同预后价值( CAC)评分和冠状动脉CT血管造影。材料与方法:获得机构审查委员会的批准和知情同意。在4338例接受64层螺旋CT评估可疑CAD的患者中,使用标准扫描方案同时进行了CAC评分和CT血管造影。采购了有关复合MACE的随访临床结果数据。建立了多变量Cox比例风险模型来预测MACE。风险调整模型纳入了CAC评分和冠状动脉CT血管造影的传统风险因素。结果:在828天+/- 380天的平均随访期间,发生了105例MACE,事件发生率为3%。冠状动脉CT血管造影术中阻塞性CAD的存在具有独立的预后价值,根据狭窄血管的数量逐渐增加(P <.001)。在接受者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析中,冠状动脉CT血管造影术对CAC评分的优越性通过ROC曲线(AUC)下明显更大的面积(0.892 vs 0.810,P <.001)得到证明,而没有明显的增量值建立了在冠状动脉CT血管造影术中增加CAC评分的方法(单独的冠状动脉CT血管造影术的AUC = 0.892,而加上CAC评分则为0.902,P = .198)。结论:在低风险的怀疑患有CAD的患者中预测MACE时,冠状动脉CT血管造影优于CAC评分。此外,与单独的冠状动脉CT血管造影术相比,当前的标准多节段CT方案(冠状动脉CT血管造影结合CAC评分)没有增加的预后价值。因此,就确定预后而言,在该人群的心脏CT方案中可能不再需要纳入CAC评分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号