...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Ductal carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: meta-analysis of underestimation and predictors of invasive breast cancer.
【24h】

Ductal carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: meta-analysis of underestimation and predictors of invasive breast cancer.

机译:穿刺针活检的原位导管癌:对浸润性乳腺癌的低估和预测因素的荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: To perform a meta-analysis to report pooled estimates for underestimation of invasive breast cancer (where core-needle biopsy [CNB] shows ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS] and excision histologic examination shows invasive breast cancer) and to identify preoperative variables that predict invasive breast cancer. Materials and Methods: Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE and were included if they provided data on DCIS underestimates (overall and according to preoperative variables). Study-specific and pooled percentages for DCIS underestimates were calculated. By using meta-regression (random effects logistic modeling) the association between each study-level preoperative variable and understaged invasive breast cancer was investigated. Results: Fifty-two studies that included 7350 cases of DCIS with findings at excision histologic examination as the reference standard met the eligibility criteria and were included. There were 1736 underestimates (invasive breast cancer at excision); the random-effects pooled estimate was 25.9% (95% confidence interval: 22.5%, 29.5%). Preoperative variables that showed significant univariate association with higher underestimation included the use of a 14-gauge automated device (vs 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, P = .006), high-grade lesion at CNB (vs non-high grade lesion, P < .001), lesion size larger than 20 mm at imaging (vs lesions
机译:目的:进行荟萃分析,以报告合并评估低估的浸润性乳腺癌(核心针活检[CNB]显示原位导管癌[DCIS],切除组织学检查显示浸润性乳腺癌),并确定术前变量预测浸润性乳腺癌。材料和方法:通过检索MEDLINE进行研究鉴定,如果研究提供的DCIS低估了数据(总体且根据术前变量),则将其包括在内。计算了DCIS被低估的研究特定百分比和合并百分比。通过使用元回归(随机效应逻辑模型),研究了每个研究水平的术前变量与阶段性浸润性乳腺癌之间的关联。结果:52项研究纳入了7350例DCIS,并在切除组织学检查中发现的结果作为参照标准,符合纳入标准。低估了1736(切除时的浸润性乳腺癌);随机效应汇总估计值为25.9%(95%置信区间:22.5%,29.5%)。术前变量显示出显着的单变量相关性并被更高的低估,包括使用14号自动装置(vs 11号真空辅助活检,P = .006),CNB的高级别病变(vs非高级别病变, P <.001),影像学上病变大于20 mm(vs病变

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号