...
首页> 外文期刊>Liver transplantation: official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society >Does middle hepatic vein omission in a right split graft affect the outcome of liver transplantation? A comparative study of right split livers with and without the middle hepatic vein.
【24h】

Does middle hepatic vein omission in a right split graft affect the outcome of liver transplantation? A comparative study of right split livers with and without the middle hepatic vein.

机译:右裂移植中肝中静脉遗漏会影响肝移植的结果吗?有和没有肝中静脉的右劈裂肝的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Preservation of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) for a right split liver transplantation (SLT) in an adult recipient is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the graft and patient outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) using a right split graft, according to the type of venous drainage. From February 2000 to May 2006, 33 patients received 34 cadaveric right split liver grafts. According to the type of recipient pairs (adult/adult or adult/child), the right liver graft was deprived of the MHV or not. The first group (GI, n = 15) included grafts with only the right hepatic vein (RHV) outflow, the second (GII, n = 18) included grafts with both right and MHV outflows. The 2 groups were similar for patient demographics, initial liver disease, and donor characteristics. In GI and GII, graft-to-recipient-weight ratio (GRWR) was 1.2 +/- 0% and 1.6 +/- 0.3% (P < 0.05), and cold ischemia time was 10 hours 55 minutes +/- 2 hours 49 minutes and 10 hours 47 minutes +/- 3 hours 32 minutes, respectively (P = not significant). Postoperative death occurred in 1 patient in each group. Vascular complications included anastomotic strictures: 2 portal vein (PV), 1 hepatic artery (HA), and 1 RHV anastomotic strictures; all in GI. Biliary complications occurred in 20% and 22% of the patients, in GI and GII, respectively (P = not significant). There were no differences between both groups regarding postoperative outcome and blood tests at day 1-15 except for a significantly higher cholestasis in GI. At 1 and 3 yr, patient survival was 94% for both groups and graft survival was 93% for GI and 90% for GII (P = not significant). In conclusion, our results suggest that adult right SLT without the MHV is safe and associated with similar long-term results as compared with those of the right graft including the MHV, despite that early liver function recovered more slowly. Technical refinements in outflow drainage should be evaluated in selected cases.
机译:在成年受者中保留肝中静脉(MHV)进行右肝分割移植(SLT)仍存在争议。这项研究的目的是根据静脉引流的类型,评估使用右劈开式肝移植术(LT)的移植物和患者预后。从2000年2月至2006年5月,有33例患者接受了34具尸体右裂肝移植。根据接受者对的类型(成人/成人或成人/儿童),右肝移植是否剥夺了MHV。第一组(GI,n = 15)包括仅有右肝静脉(RHV)流出的移植物,第二组(GII,n = 18)包括具有右肝和MHV流出的移植物。两组患者的人口统计学特征,初始肝病和供体特征相似。在GI和GII中,移植物与收件人的重量比(GRWR)为1.2 +/- 0%和1.6 +/- 0.3%(P <0.05),冷缺血时间为10小时55分钟+/- 2小时49分钟和10小时47分钟+/- 3小时32分钟(P =无关紧要)。每组中有1名患者发生术后死亡。血管并发症包括吻合口狭窄:2条门静脉(PV),1条肝动脉(HA)和1条RHV吻合口狭窄。全部在GI中。胃肠道并发症分别在GI和GII中发生在20%和22%的患者中(P =不显着)。两组的术后结局和第1-15天的血液检查无差异,除了胃肠道胆汁淤积明显升高。在第1年和第3年,两组患者的存活率均为94%,GI的移植物存活率为93%,GII的移植物存活率为90%(P =不显着)。总之,我们的结果表明,与没有MHV的成人右SLT相比,包括MHV的右移植物,其早期肝功能恢复较慢,是安全的,并且具有相似的长期结果。在特定情况下,应评估流出排水的技术改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号