...
首页> 外文期刊>Liver transplantation: official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society >The Difference in the Fibrosis Progression of Recurrent Hepatitis C After Live Donor Liver Transplantation Versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation Is Attributable to the Difference in Donor Age
【24h】

The Difference in the Fibrosis Progression of Recurrent Hepatitis C After Live Donor Liver Transplantation Versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation Is Attributable to the Difference in Donor Age

机译:活体供体肝移植后复发性丙型肝炎纤维化进展的差异与已故的供体肝移植后死亡的差异可归因于供体年龄的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hepatitis C recurs universally after liver transplantation (LT). Whether its progression differs after live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) is still debated. We retrospectively analyzed 201 consecutive LTs performed at our institution for hepatitis C-related end-stage liver disease between April 2000 and December 2005 (46 LDLTs and 155 DDLTs). Patients were followed with protocol biopsies for medians of 29 (LDLT) and 39 months (DDLT; P = 0.7). Although overall graft and patient survival did not differ, the mean fibrosis stage (Metavir) was significantly higher at 12 to 48 months post-LT (all P < 0.05), and the rate of fibrosis progression tended to be faster after DDLT than LDLT (0.19 versus 0.11 stage/year, P 0.05). In univariate analysis, donor age, cold ischemic time, and DDLT were significantly associated with a fibrosis stage >= 1 at 1 year and a fibrosis stage of 3 or 4 at 2 years post-LT. In multivariate analysis, however, donor age was the sole variable independently associated with both surrogate outcomes. Thus, donor age > 45 years carried a relative risk of 8.17 (confidence interval = 2.6-25.5, P = 0.001) for reaching fibrosis stage 3 or 4 at 2 years post-LT. In conclusion, donor age, rather than the transplant approach, determines the progression of recurrent hepatitis C after LT. LDLT, allowing for the selection of younger donors, may particularly benefit hepatitis C patients. Liver Transpl 14:1778-1786, 2008. (C) 2008 AASLD.
机译:丙型肝炎在肝移植(LT)后普遍复发。活供体肝移植(LDLT)和已故供体肝移植(DDLT)后其进展是否不同尚有争议。我们回顾性分析了我们机构在2000年4月至2005年12月之间针对丙型肝炎相关终末期肝病进行的201例连续LT(46例LDLT和155例DDLT)。对患者进行方案活检,中位数为29(LDLT)和39个月(DDLT; P = 0.7)。尽管总体移植物和患者生存率无差异,但LT后12至48个月的平均纤维化分期(Metavir)明显更高(所有P <0.05),DDLT后的纤维化进展速度倾向于快于LDLT( 0.19 vs 0.11阶段/年,P 0.05)。在单变量分析中,供体年龄,寒冷缺血时间和DDLT与LT后1年的纤维化阶段> = 1和LT后2年的3或4的纤维化阶段显着相关。然而,在多变量分析中,供体年龄是与两种替代结果独立相关的唯一变量。因此,年龄> 45岁的供体在LT后2年达到3或4级纤维化的相对风险为8.17(置信区间= 2.6-25.5,P = 0.001)。总之,供体年龄而非移植方法决定了LT后复发性丙型肝炎的进展。 LDLT允许选择年轻的捐赠者,这可能会使丙型肝炎患者特别受益。 Liver Transpl 14:1778-1786,2008。(C)2008 AASLD。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号