...
首页> 外文期刊>Neural computing & applications >Intelligent methods for solving inverse problems of backscattering spectra with noise: a comparison between neural networks and simulated annealing
【24h】

Intelligent methods for solving inverse problems of backscattering spectra with noise: a comparison between neural networks and simulated annealing

机译:解决带有噪声的反向散射光谱反问题的智能方法:神经网络和模拟退火的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper investigates two different intelligent techniques - the neural network (NN) method and the simulated annealing (SA) algorithm for solving the inverse problem of Rutherford backscattering (RBS) with noisy data. The RBS inverse problem is to determine the sample structure information from measured spectra, which can be defined as either a function approximation or a non-linear optimization problem. Early studies emphasized on numerical methods and empirical fitting. In this work, we have applied intelligent techniques and compared their performance and effectiveness for spectral data analysis by solving the inverse problem. Since each RBS spectrum may contain up to 512 data points, principal component analysis is used to make the feature extraction so as to ease the complexity of constructing the network. The innovative aspects of our work include introducing dimensionality reduction and noise modeling. Experiments on RBS spectra from SiGe thin films on a silicon substrate show that the SA is more accurate but the NN is faster, though both methods produce satisfactory results. Both methods are resilient to 10% Poisson noise in the input. These new findings indicate that in RBS data analysis the NN approach should be preferred when fast processing is required; whereas the SA method becomes the first choice should the analysis accuracy be targeted.
机译:本文研究了两种不同的智能技术-神经网络(NN)方法和模拟退火(SA)算法,用于解决带噪数据的卢瑟福反向散射(RBS)的反问题。 RBS反问题是根据测得的光谱确定样品结构信息,可以将其定义为函数逼近问题或非线性优化问题。早期的研究强调数值方法和经验拟合。在这项工作中,我们应用了智能技术,并通过解决反问题比较了它们在光谱数据分析中的性能和有效性。由于每个RBS频谱最多可包含512个数据点,因此使用主成分分析进行特征提取,从而减轻构建网络的复杂性。我们工作的创新之处包括引入降维和噪声建模。在硅衬底上的SiGe薄膜上进行RBS光谱实验表明,虽然两种方法都能产生令人满意的结果,但SA精度更高,但是NN更快。两种方法都能抵抗输入中10%的泊松噪声。这些新发现表明,在RBS数据分析中,当需要快速处理时,应首选NN方法。如果要达到分析的准确性,则SA方法将成为首选。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号