...
首页> 外文期刊>Lung cancer: Journal of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer >The safety and efficacy of EGFR TKIs monotherapy versus single-agent chemotherapy using third-generation cytotoxics as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and poor performance status
【24h】

The safety and efficacy of EGFR TKIs monotherapy versus single-agent chemotherapy using third-generation cytotoxics as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and poor performance status

机译:EGFR TKIs单药治疗与单药化疗以第三代细胞毒素为一线治疗对于晚期非小细胞肺癌和低下状态患者的安全性和有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: To assess the risk/benefit profiles of EGFR TKIs monotherapy using erlotinib or gefitinib in comparison with single-agent chemotherapy using third-generation cytotoxics (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, taxanes) as the first-line treatment for chemonaive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (ANSCLC) and poor performance status (PS). Methods: A pooled analysis and systematic review was performed using trials identified through MED-LINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and the Clinical-Trials.gov. Data were collected from randomized and non-randomized phase II or III clinical trials of EGFR TKIs monotherapy or single-agent chemotherapy using third-generation cytotoxics published before 3/1/2010, and the pooled estimates for efficacy and safety outcomes of interest were calculated. Results: Fifteen eligible trials (1425 patients) were selected from 323 studies that initially were identified. In 5 of the selected single-agent chemotherapy studies, the elderly were included together with poor PS patients. Outcomes from these studies still were employed for a thorough analysis. Targeting poor PS patients, we found that the pooled response rate (95% confidence interval) to EGFR TKIs for unselected population was 6% (3-8%), not substantially different from 9% (6-13%) reported by single-agent chemotherapy trials using third-generation cytotoxics. However, EGFR TKIs had better disease control rates with a pooled estimate of 40% (33-47%), significantly higher than 30% (20-41%) of the cytotoxics. Single-agent chemotherapy trials enrolling both elderly and poor PS patients had better results with the pooled response rate and the pooled disease control rate was 13% (11-16%) and 41% (36-46%) respectively. For safety information, despite both treatments were well-tolerated, the toxicity profile of EGFR TKIs was clearly more favorable than that reported by chemotherapy. The severe hematological adverse events related to EGFR TKIs treatment were rare. EGFR TKIs also tende...
机译:目的:与使用第三代细胞毒素(吉西他滨,长春瑞滨,紫杉烷类药物作为一线治疗,晚期非小剂量化疗阳性患者的一线治疗)相比,评估使用厄洛替尼或吉非替尼的EGFR TKIs单药治疗的风险/获益情况细胞肺癌(ANSCLC)和不良表现状态(PS)。方法:使用通过MED-LINE,EMBASE,Cochrane图书馆和Clinical-Trials.gov鉴定的试验进行汇总分析和系统评价。数据收集于2010年3月1日之前发布的使用第三代细胞毒物进行的EGFR TKIs单药治疗或单药化疗的II期或III期随机和非随机II期或III期临床试验中,并计算了相关疗效和安全性结果的合并估算值。结果:从最初确定的323项研究中选择了15项合格试验(1425例患者)。在5项选定的单药化疗研究中,将老年人与贫困PS患者包括在内。这些研究的结果仍被用于全面分析。针对贫困的PS患者,我们发现未选择人群对EGFR TKIs的汇总缓解率(95%置信区间)为6%(3-8%),与单因素报告的9%(6-13%)没有显着差异使用第三代细胞毒素进行药物化疗试验。但是,EGFR TKIs的疾病控制率更高,汇总估计为40%(33-47%),明显高于30%(20-41%)的细胞毒素。纳入老年和贫困PS患者的单药化疗试验结果更好,合并缓解率和疾病控制合并率分别为13%(11-16%)和41%(36-46%)。为了安全起见,尽管两种疗法均耐受良好,但EGFR TKIs的毒性特征明显优于化学疗法报道的毒性。与EGFR TKIs治疗相关的严重血液学不良事件很少见。 EGFR TKIs也趋向于...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号