首页> 外文期刊>Cell biochemistry and biophysics >The Optimal Velocity Criterion in the Diagnosis of Unilateral Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis by Transcranial Doppler
【24h】

The Optimal Velocity Criterion in the Diagnosis of Unilateral Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis by Transcranial Doppler

机译:经颅多普勒诊断单侧中脑动脉狭窄的最佳速度判据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We evaluated the optimal flow velocity of transcranial doppler (TCD) in detecting unilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) stenosis and stenosis grading by magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) as the reference standard. 302 nonconsecutive patients with unilateral MCA stenosis detected by TCD underwent MRA of the intracranial arteries. The peak systolic velocity (PSV), mean flow velocity (MFV), and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) of each MCA were recorded. 604 MCA were categorized into four groups depending on the stenosis severity: normal MCA (n = 319, 52.8 %), mild stenosis (n = 94, 15.6 %), moderate stenosis (n = 66, 10.9 %), and severe stenosis (n = 125, 20.7 %). Significant differences in PSV, MFV, and EDV between these four groups were observed (P < 0.001, respectively). The optimal cutoff velocities for detecting MCA stenosis were: PSV = 160 cm/s, MFV = 100 cm/s, EDV = 60 cm/s; the optimal cutoff points to distinguish mild from moderate stenosis were: PSV = 200 cm/s, MFV = 120 cm/s, EDV = 80 cm/s; the cutoffs to distinguish moderate from severe stenosis were: PSV = 280 cm/s, MFV = 180 cm/s, EDV = 110 cm/s. Using PSV as the diagnostic criteria, the correlation for diagnosing MCA stenosis using TCD and MCA was good (Kappa number κ = 0.668); using as MFV criteria, κ = 0.641. The optimal cutoff PSV values in stenosis grading on TCD were 160, 200, and 280 cm/s. The optimal cutoff MFV values were 100, 120, and 180 cm/s. PSV is more accurate than MFV in detecting and grading MCA stenosis.
机译:我们评估了经颅多普勒(TCD)在检测单侧大脑中动脉(MCA)狭窄和以磁共振血管造影(MRA)作为参考的狭窄分级中的最佳流速。通过TCD检测到的302例非连续性单侧MCA狭窄患者接受了颅内动脉MRA检查。记录每个MCA的峰值收缩速度(PSV),平均流速(MFV)和舒张末期速度(EDV)。 604 MCA根据狭窄严重程度分为四类:正常MCA(n = 319,52.8%),轻度狭窄(n = 94,15.6%),中度狭窄(n = 66,10.9%)和严重狭窄( n = 125,20.7%)。观察到这四组之间的PSV,MFV和EDV有显着差异(分别为P <0.001)。检测MCA狭窄的最佳截止速度为:PSV = 160 cm / s,MFV = 100 cm / s,EDV = 60 cm / s;区分轻度和中度狭窄的最佳截止点为:PSV = 200 cm / s,MFV = 120 cm / s,EDV = 80 cm / s;区分中度狭窄和严重狭窄的临界值是:PSV = 280 cm / s,MFV = 180 cm / s,EDV = 110 cm / s。以PSV为诊断标准,使用TCD和MCA诊断MCA狭窄的相关性良好(卡伯值κ= 0.668);使用MFV标准,κ= 0.641。在TCD上进行狭窄分级的最佳PSV截止值为160、200和280 cm / s。最佳截止MFV值为100、120和180 cm / s。 PSV在检测和分级MCA狭窄方面比MFV更准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号