首页> 外文期刊>Limnologica >Lake restoration studies: Failures, bottlenecks and prospects of new ecotechnological measures
【24h】

Lake restoration studies: Failures, bottlenecks and prospects of new ecotechnological measures

机译:湖泊恢复研究:新生态技术措施的失败,瓶颈和前景

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper critically reviews the published works on lake restoration in north-western Europe, with the aim to highlight the causes of failures of lake biomanipulation, and to identify the main bottlenecks that have impeded progress. More importantly, we explore the prospects of applying new ecotechnological measures to lakes with a focus on shallow lakes. These complementary measures are: (I) reduction of sediment resuspension; (2) water-level management; and (3) the use in shallow lakes of bivalves as effective grazers on lake seston. especially when cyanobacteria are dominant. If the sustainability of the positive effects of biomanipulation is considered over a decade, there are probably more cases of failures than successes. The failures can be ascribed to several bottlenecks that include: (1) inadequate reduction of allochthonous phosphorus (P) and an increase in autochthonous P inputs, i.e. release of P from the lake sediments following reductions of external P inputs; (2) poor edibility of filamentous and colonial cyanobacteria to daphnids; (3) inadequate coverage of the lake area by macrophytes partly due to foraging on the macrophytes by both fish and birds; (4) ineffective reduction of planktivorous fish biomass and our inability to maintain the fish mass to a 'low level' for longer periods; and (5) failure of northern pike (Esox lucius) after its transplantation to the lakes to develop a population level that can control planktivorous fish to desired low levels. Three potentially complementary ecotechnological measures are discussed. The first such measure concerns prevention of sediment resuspension in lakes by creating islands in order to minimise the wind fetch to reduce the wave amplitude. The second measure involves allowing greater water-level fluctuations (WLF) in lakes as planned in lowland countries like the Netherlands; WLF are likely to allow more space for water, and may lead to improved water quality and higher biodiversity. The third ecotechnological measure relates to grazer populations that complement herbivorous zooplankton to regulate phytoplankton, particularly to control cyanobacterial blooms. For this, the bivalve Dreissena polymorpha appears to be a good potential candidate for grazing on phytoplankton, especially in shallow eutrophic lakes that are dominated by filamentous and toxic cyanobacteria (e.g. Planktothrix agardhii and Microcystis aeruginosa).
机译:本文批判性地回顾了已发表的有关西北欧湖泊恢复的著作,目的是强调湖泊生物操纵失败的原因,并找出阻碍进展的主要瓶颈。更重要的是,我们探索将新的生态技术措施应用于湖泊的前景,重点是浅湖。这些补充措施是:(I)减少沉积物的悬浮; (2)水位管理; (3)在浅水湖泊中使用双壳类动物作为塞斯顿湖上的有效放牧者。特别是在蓝细菌占主导地位的情况下。如果考虑到生物操纵的积极作用的可持续性超过十年,那么失败比成功的案例可能更多。失败的原因可归结为以下几个瓶颈:(1)异源磷(P)的降低不足和自生磷输入的增加,即外部磷输入减少后湖泊沉积物中的磷释放; (2)丝状和菌落蓝细菌对水蚤的可食性较差; (3)大型植物对湖区的覆盖不足,部分原因是鱼类和鸟类在大型植物上觅食; (4)不能有效减少浮游鱼类的生物量,并且我们无法长时间保持鱼群处于“低水平”; (5)北部派克(Esox lucius)移植到湖泊后未能发展出能够将浮游鱼类控制在所需低水平的种群水平。讨论了三种可能互补的生态技术措施。第一个此类措施涉及通过创建岛屿以最小化风量以减小波幅来防止湖泊中的沉积物再悬浮。第二项措施涉及按照荷兰等低地国家的计划,在湖泊中增加水位波动(WLF); WLF可能会为水提供更多的空间,并可能导致水质改善和生物多样性提高。第三种生态技术措施涉及放牧者种群,该种群补充草食性浮游动物以调节浮游植物,特别是控制蓝细菌的繁殖。为此,双壳纲Dreissena polymorpha似乎是在浮游植物上放牧的良好潜在候选者,特别是在以丝状和有毒蓝藻为主的浅水富营养化湖泊中(例如浮游植物浮萍和铜绿微囊藻)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号