首页> 外文期刊>Norsk geografisk tidsskrift >Elite discourses of regional identity in a new regionalism developmentscheme: The case of the 'Mountain Region' in Norway
【24h】

Elite discourses of regional identity in a new regionalism developmentscheme: The case of the 'Mountain Region' in Norway

机译:在新的地区主义发展计划中的地区认同的精英论述:以挪威“山区”为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Norway's regional structure is under debate as questions about territorial boundaries, scale, scope of tasks and responsibilities, anddecision-making structures have become an issue in Norwegian politics. This tendency of changing the scale of public action withregard to governmental structures, economic politics, welfare, and civic society has been termed 'new regionalism'. New regionalismoften comes under criticism of being too neo-liberalistic or too economically orientated, leaving in its wake debates of democraticaccountability and the neglect of 'soft factors' (i.e. socio-culture, identity, consciousness, and participation). In this article theauthors investigate whether new democratic or semi-democratic regional organisations as advocated by new regionalist schemesrequire identification amongst the local population in order to be successful and enduring governmental structures. Further, it isshown how too simplistic understandings of the social processes, and their inherent power aspects, involved in the implementationof the new regionalist development scheme 'Mountain Region' distort the undertaking. The authors find that a more complexrelational and contextual understanding is in demand, one in which regionalisation is not only recognised as a process whichdiffuses across time-space, but also takes an asymmetrical place across society's social fabric, and one where 'soft factors' such as'regional identity' are not sidestepped.
机译:由于有关领土边界,规模,任务和责任范围以及决策结构的问题已成为挪威政治中的一个问题,挪威的区域结构仍在辩论中。这种相对于政府结构,经济政治,福利和公民社会而言,改变公共行动规模的趋势被称为“新区域主义”。新的地区主义常常受到批评,认为它们过于新自由主义或过于注重经济,因而引发了关于民主责任和对“软因素”(即社会文化,身份,意识和参与)的忽视的辩论。在本文中,作者调查了新的地区主义计划所倡导的新的民主或半民主的地区组织是否需要在当地居民中进行识别,以便建立成功且持久的政府机构。此外,它表明了在实施新的区域主义发展计划“山区”中所涉及的社会过程及其固有权力方面的过于简单的理解会扭曲这项工作。作者发现,需要一种更复杂的关系和上下文理解,在这种理解中,区域化不仅被认为是一个跨时空扩散的过程,而且在整个社会的社会结构中处于不对称的位置,而“软因素”就是这样一种过程。因为“区域身份”并没有回避。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号