首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >Accounting for farmers' production responses to environmental restrictions within landscape planning
【24h】

Accounting for farmers' production responses to environmental restrictions within landscape planning

机译:在景观规划中考虑农民对环境限制的生产反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Environmental planning aims to safeguard and foster the ecological functionality of agricultural landscapes. In order to reach a sustainable development of agricultural landscapes, in addition to ecological objectives socio-economic ones also need to be considered. In this context, the authors draw attention to three points. First, whenever ecologically sensitive areas ('ecological sites') are used for agricultural production, it is necessary to take account of the fact that farmers tend to adapt to environmental requirements by production responses outside the ecological site itself. Second, in order to identify the socially most 'desirable' land-use responses it is necessary to supplement the above-mentioned environmental objectives by socio-economic ones. Third, when choosing an appropriate model for such multi-criteria decision analysis, the question of substitutability between criteria is of utmost importance. The paper discusses the above-mentioned issues against the background of a case study of environmental planning for an ecologically very valuable agricultural landscape in Germany, the Bayerisches Donauried. Two models of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) are applied, one based on the 'single synthesizing criterion' method, and the other one based on the 'synthesis by outranking' method. The models serve to evaluate four different land-use options, using criteria mainly derived from landscape functions and weights gained from interviews with major stakeholders. The paper presents the models' results concerning the ranking of the different land-use options and discusses the implications for agri-environmental policies and rural development planning.
机译:环境规划旨在维护和促进农业景观的生态功能。为了实现农业景观的可持续发展,除了生态目标外,还需要考虑社会经济目标。在这种情况下,作者提请注意三点。首先,每当将生态敏感地区(“生态场所”)用于农业生产时,就有必要考虑到这样一个事实,即农民倾向于通过生态场所本身之外的生产反应来适应环境要求。第二,为了确定社会上最“理想的”土地利用反应,有必要用社会经济目标补充上述环境目标。第三,在为这种多准则决策分析选择合适的模型时,准则之间的可替代性问题至关重要。本文在对德国生态学上非常有价值的农业景观Bayerisches Donauried进行环境规划的案例研究的背景下,讨论了上述问题。应用了两种多标准决策分析(MCDA)模型,一种基于“单一综合标准”方法,另一种基于“超越排名综合”方法。该模型使用主要来自景观功能和从与主要利益相关者的访谈中获得的权重得出的标准来评估四种不同的土地利用方案。本文介绍了有关不同土地利用方案等级的模型结果,并讨论了对农业环境政策和农村发展规划的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号