...
首页> 外文期刊>Library Resources & Technical Services >The Bibliographic Control of Foreign Monographs: A Review and Baseline Study
【24h】

The Bibliographic Control of Foreign Monographs: A Review and Baseline Study

机译:外国专着的书目控制:回顾与基线研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The acquisition of foreign research publications has been an important activity of American university libraries from the early 19th century to the present day. The growth of scholarship in the post-war period, particularly in area studies, has made access to foreign research more essential than ever. In this article u>e assess the extent of bibliographic control over foreign published monographs. Previous evaluations of national bibliographic utility hit rates and quality assessment studies of bibliographic records are reviewed. These reviews suggest that the bibliographic control over general research monographs is better than the bibliographic control over foreign research monographs. However, the previous studies' varying sampling periods and techniques necessitate a baseline study to confirm the asserted difference of these two groups of monographs. The baseline study reported here confirms a lack of bibliographic control for a substantial portion of foreign monographs. Furthermore, an examination of the source of bibliographic records, the presence of Library of Congress classification, and the level of bibliographic description show that the quality of bibliographic records for foreign monographs is lower than the quality of records for domestic monographs.
机译:从19世纪初至今,获取外国研究出版物一直是美国大学图书馆的重要活动。战后时期,尤其是在地区研究方面,奖学金的增长使获得外国研究变得比以往任何时候都更加重要。在本文中,我们将评估对国外已出版专着的书目控制程度。回顾了以前对国家书目实用率的评估以及书目记录的质量评估研究。这些评论表明,对一般研究专着的书目控制优于对外国研究专着的书目控制。但是,以前的研究采用不同的采样周期和技术,因此需要进行基线研究以确认这两类专论所主张的差异。此处报道的基准研究证实,外国专着中相当一部分没有书目控制。此外,对书目记录来源,国会图书馆分类的存在以及书目描述水平的检查表明,外国专着的书目记录质量低于国内专着的书目记录质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号