...
首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >The 'Neighbourhood Effect': a multidisciplinary assessment of the case for farmer co-ordination in agri-environmental programmes.
【24h】

The 'Neighbourhood Effect': a multidisciplinary assessment of the case for farmer co-ordination in agri-environmental programmes.

机译:“邻里效应”:对农业环境计划中农民协调案例的多学科评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper we present a multi-disciplinary analysis of the potential impacts of undertaking similar environmental actions on multiple farms in a small geographic area, using organic farming as a proxy for a co-ordinated approach. Recent papers have called for more co-ordinated efforts between farmers in terms of their environmental actions, but there has been limited applied research demonstrating the environmental benefits or the economic and social implications to farmers of this approach. Comparative analysis of biodiversity, soil and water, and farm profitability were undertaken in England on 32 matched farms in areas of low and high organic farming concentration; qualitative interviews were also conducted with 48 farmers living in two of the eight areas. Findings demonstrate higher overall levels of biodiversity on organic farms (particularly in "hotspot" areas) but this was not universal across the species groups investigated. Higher water infiltration rates were found in organic grasslands, which could prove to be a useful measure to combat flooding. In terms of the technical efficiency of producing these environmental gains, conventional and organic farms in hotspot areas demonstrated equivalent efficiency from a financial perspective. Socio-cultural research identified the different amounts of trust farmers have in their neighbours, based in part on their performance as 'good farmers'. We discuss the neighbourhood effect with a multi-disciplinary approach and conclude that encouraging local farmer co-ordination can have clear environmental benefits without high economic cost, but must be undertaken with caution - specifically regarding the trade-offs between benefits, local geophysical and social characteristics, and assumptions made about inter-farmer trust.
机译:在本文中,我们使用有机农业作为协调方法的代表,对在较小地理区域内的多个农场采取类似的环境行动可能产生的影响进行多学科分析。最近的论文呼吁农民之间在环境行动方面进行更多的协调努力,但是很少有应用研究表明这种方法的环境效益或对农民的经济和社会影响。在英格兰,对有机耕作集中度较低和较高的地区的32个匹配农场进行了生物多样性,土壤和水以及农场获利能力的比较分析;还对居住在八个地区中两个地区的48位农民进行了定性访谈。研究结果表明,有机农场(特别是在“热点”地区)的生物多样性总体水平较高,但这在所调查的物种组中并不普遍。在有机草原中发现较高的水渗透率,这可能是对抗洪水的有用措施。就产生这些环境收益的技术效率而言,热点地区的传统农场和有机农场从财务角度来看具有同等效率。社会文化研究确定农民对邻居的信任程度不同,部分原因是农民表现为“好农民”。我们采用多学科的方法讨论邻里效应,并得出结论,鼓励当地农民协调可以在不付出高昂经济成本的情况下获得明显的环境利益,但必须谨慎行事-特别是在利益,当地地球物理和社会利益之间的权衡特征和关于农民间信任的假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号