...
首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >Watershed management in an urban setting: process, scale and administration.
【24h】

Watershed management in an urban setting: process, scale and administration.

机译:城市环境中的流域管理:流程,规模和管理。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Efforts in post-industrial countries to refine environment and planning administration in the face of unprecedented urban growth have important implications for ecological systems and human quality of life. This paper uses the case of an urban riparian corridor in South East Queensland, Australia to contribute to understandings of interactions between land use planning processes, watershed management initiatives and broader administrative structures in urban and rapidly urbanising settings. In particular it examines the understudied application of watershed management to an urban setting. Analysis of changes to the structure and function of urban riparian corridor management over time show that changes have occurred as a result of broader policy and institutional change in three distinct phases: top-down watershed management policy (1996-2000), regional natural resource and population growth management policy (2001-2005) and the recent re-emergence of local government as the dominant actor in a multilevel networked context (2006-2008). Trends toward regional scale approaches and increased urban planning initiatives have tended to concentrate responsibilities for urban environmental management with local government. This is in contrast to most rural natural resource management experience, and highlights the importance of meta-governance frameworks in ensuring the enduring applicability of the watershed management model to urban and rapidly urbanising catchments.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.05.003
机译:后工业化国家为应对前所未有的城市发展而改善环境和规划行政管理的努力,对生态系统和人类生活质量具有重要意义。本文以澳大利亚昆士兰州东南部的城市河岸走廊为例,以帮助人们理解在城市和快速城市化环境中土地利用规划过程,流域管理计划和更广泛的行政结构之间的相互作用。特别是研究了流域管理在城市环境中未被充分研究的应用。对城市河岸走廊管理结构和功能随时间变化的分析表明,变化是由于政策和机构变化在三个不同的阶段发生的:自上而下的分水岭管理政策(1996-2000年),区域自然资源和人口增长管理政策(2001-2005年)和最近在多层次网络环境中重新出现的地方政府作为主导者(2006-2008年)。区域规模方法的趋势和日益增长的城市规划倡议已趋向于将地方政府对城市环境管理的责任集中。这与大多数农村自然资源管理经验形成了鲜明对比,并强调了元治理框架在确保流域管理模型对城市和快速城市化集水区的持久适用性方面的重要性。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org /10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.05.003

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号