...
首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >Delineation of property rights as institutional foundations for urban land markets in transition
【24h】

Delineation of property rights as institutional foundations for urban land markets in transition

机译:划定产权作为转型中城市土地市场的制度基础

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper aims to critically reflect on establishing the new frameworks for land markets and urban land development processes in countries in transition. Based on the doctrine of the so-called 'property rights' school, land and property ownership has long been identified as a prerequisite for economic development. The common advice to countries in transition creating new frameworks for land markets was to assign and register property rights. The aim of this paper is to discuss the significance of the delineation of property rights, which for urban land development processes and outcomes falls mainly within the remit of land use regulations. In this paper the concept of property rights regime and its characteristics is developed in order to discuss the delineation of property rights and their relationship with urban land development process and its outcome. Process of land development is conceptualized depending on land ownership (private or public), and the role of the owner in the planning process. The outcome is discussed based on the morphological results and the provision of urban infrastructure. On the basis of empirical experience from transition period in Poland it is argued that the emphasis on private property rights in the absence of the institutional foundations of urban land market under capitalism was bound to produce urban problems. First, the new institutional foundation for urban land market was introduced subsequent to dynamic of emerging real estate market, and viable markets existed despite unsolved question of restitution of property rights. Second, the subsequent delineation of property rights is clearly linked to processes of urban land development, which follow the line of development without planning. It can also be related to the morphological results of urban development like the haphazard location of investments and lack of adequate approach to deal with the provision of urban infrastructure
机译:本文旨在批判性地思考建立转型国家土地市场和城市土地开发过程的新框架。根据所谓的“产权”学校的学说,土地和财产所有权早已被确定为经济发展的先决条件。给转型期国家建立土地市场新框架的共同建议是转让和注册产权。本文的目的是讨论产权划分的重要性,这对于城市土地开发过程和成果主要属于土地使用法规的范围之内。本文讨论了产权制度的概念及其特征,以讨论产权的界定及其与城市土地开发过程及其结果的关系。土地开发过程的概念化取决于土地所有权(私有或公共)以及所有者在规划过程中的作用。基于形态学结果和城市基础设施的提供来讨论结果。根据波兰过渡时期的经验,有人认为,在资本主义制度下缺乏城市土地市场的制度基础的情况下,对私有产权的强调必然会产生城市问题。首先,随着新兴房地产市场的活跃,引入了城市土地市场的新制度基础,尽管还没有解决恢复产权的问题,但存在可行的市场。其次,随后对财产权的界定显然与城市土地开发过程有关,城市土地开发过程没有规划就遵循发展路线。它也可能与城市发展的形态学结果有关,例如随意投资的地点以及缺乏适当的方法来应对城市基础设施的提供

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号