...
首页> 外文期刊>Leprosy review >Interventions for erythema nodosum leprosum. A Cochrane review
【24h】

Interventions for erythema nodosum leprosum. A Cochrane review

机译:结节性红斑麻风病的干预措施。 Cochrane评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Treatment for erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL), an immunological complication of leprosy, is diverse. We undertook a systematic review as it was not clear which treatments were most beneficial. Methods: We did a systematic search to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatment with placebo, no treatment or another therapy. Two authors assessed quality and checked data. Results: We included 13 studies involving 445 participants. These trials assessed: betamethasone, thalidomide, pentoxifylline, clofazimine, indomethacin and levamisole. The quality of the trials was generally poor and no results could be pooled due to the treatments being so heterogeneous. Treatment with thalidomide showed a significant benefit compared to aspirin (RR 2.43; 95% CI 1.28 to 4.59). Clofazimine treatment was superior to prednisolone (more treatment successes; RR 3.67; 95% CI 1.36 to 9.91) and thalidomide (fewer recurrences; RR 0.08; 95% CI 0.01, 0.56). Minor adverse events were significantly lower in participants on a low dose thalidomide regimen compared to a high dose thalidomide regimen (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.93). Significantly more minor adverse events were reported in participants taking clofazimine compared with prednisolone (RR 1.92; 95% CI 1.10 to 3.35). None of the studies assessed quality of life or economic outcomes. Conclusion: There is some evidence of benefit for thalidomide and clofazimine, but generally we did not find clear benefits for interventions in the management of ENL.
机译:简介:麻风病的免疫并发症结节性红斑麻风病(ENL)的治疗方法多种多样。由于尚不清楚哪种治疗方法最有利,我们进行了系统的审查。方法:我们进行了系统搜索,以找出比较安慰剂,无治疗或其他疗法的随机对照试验(RCT)。两位作者评估了质量并检查了数据。结果:我们纳入了13个研究,涉及445名参与者。这些试验评估了:倍他米松,沙利度胺,己酮可可碱,氯法齐明,消炎痛和左旋咪唑。试验的质量通常很差,并且由于治疗方法的异质性,无法汇总任何结果。与阿司匹林相比,沙利度胺治疗显示出显着益处(RR 2.43; 95%CI 1.28至4.59)。氯法齐明治疗优于泼尼松龙(治疗成功率更高; RR 3.67; 95%CI 1.36至9.91)和沙利度胺(复发率更低; RR 0.08; 95%CI 0.01、0.56)。与高剂量沙利度胺方案相比,低剂量沙利度胺方案参与者的次要不良事件显着更低(RR 0.46; 95%CI 0.23至0.93)。与泼尼松龙相比,服用氯氟嗪明的参与者发生轻微不良事件的发生率明显更高(RR 1.92; 95%CI 1.10至3.35)。没有研究评估生活质量或经济成果。结论:有一些证据表明沙利度胺和氯法齐明有益,但通常我们没有发现干预ENL的明显益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号