...
首页> 外文期刊>NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences >The tension between common sense and scientific perception of animals: recent developments in research on animal integrity
【24h】

The tension between common sense and scientific perception of animals: recent developments in research on animal integrity

机译:动物常识与科学知觉之间的张力:动物完整性研究的最新进展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A distinction can be made between aesthetic or intuitive perception in holistic biology and in daily life, and reductionistic scientific perception based on the search for causal mechanisms. Going from our observations of animals in daily life to observations of animals in scientific experiments implies a transformation. Scientific experiments exclude all values that are important in daily life. For research on the concept of animal welfare it can be shown that excluding values is impossible as thisissue lies too close to our daily experience. This means that the empirical and the moral domain of the concept cannot in fact be separated. And by means of the moral domain, background theories about man's relation to nature, about the role of natural science, and about what is morally relevant play a role in definitions of animal welfare. This is illustrated for two bioethical theories: zoocentrism and biocentrism. In the zoocentric theory, only sentient animals are morally relevant. Some consider theargument that genetic engineering violates the integrity of an organism not a moral issue, but an aesthetic one. In a biocentric ethical theory, all living beings have moral relevance; moral and aesthetic issues are then closely related. In such a theory the characteristic nature of an animal is respected and knowledge of this natufe is intimately related to a more aesthetic and holistic perception of animals. This paper shows that the ethical attitude towards nature is directly linked to the way humanbeings perceive nature. In experimental reductionistic science, nature is seen as a material object, subject to mechanistic analysis: when animals are subjected to scientific experiments it is impossible to completely avoid ethical issues, but they arerestricted to utilitarian ones. The genetic engineering of animals enhanced awareness of ethical issues directly relating to the technology itself and to the attitude towards nature underlying it, irrespective of the consequences. These issues only comeup when the animal is perceived in a holistic way, which comes close to our perception of animals in our daily life.
机译:可以在整体生物学和日常生活中的美学或直觉知觉与基于因果机制的寻找的还原主义科学知觉之间进行区分。从我们对日常生活中动物的观察到科学实验中对动物的观察,都意味着一种转变。科学实验排除了日常生活中所有重要的价值。对于动物福利概念的研究可以表明,排除价值是不可能的,因为该问题太接近我们的日常经验。这意味着该概念的经验和道德范围实际上无法分开。通过道德领域,关于人与自然的关系,自然科学的作用以及与道德有关的背景理论在动物福利的定义中发挥了作用。两种生物伦理理论对此进行了说明:动物中心论和生物中心论。在以动物为中心的理论中,只有有知觉的动物在道德上才有意义。一些人认为,基因工程侵犯了有机体的完整性,这不是道德问题,而是美学问题。在以生物为中心的伦理学理论中,所有生物都具有道德关联性。道德和审美问题便紧密相关。在这样的理论中,动物的特性受到尊重,而对这种天然纤维的了解与动物对动物的审美和整体感知密切相关。本文表明,对自然的伦理态度与人类对自然的看法直接相关。在实验还原论科学中,自然被视为物质对象,需要进行机械分析:当动物经受科学实验时,不可能完全避免道德问题,但是它们仅限于功利主义问题。动物的基因工程增强了人们对与技术本身直接相关的伦理问题的认识,以及与后果无关的对自然的态度。仅当以整体方式感知动物时才出现这些问题,这与我们在日常生活中对动物的感知非常接近。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号