...
首页> 外文期刊>Learning & behavior >Latent inhibition in flavor-preference conditioning: Effects of motivational state and the nature of the reinforcer
【24h】

Latent inhibition in flavor-preference conditioning: Effects of motivational state and the nature of the reinforcer

机译:潜在的风味偏好调节抑制:动机状态和增强剂性质的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In two experiments, rats received pairings of the flavor of almond with either fructose or maltodextrin, and the conditioned preference for almond was then tested. In each experiment, half of the rats had received prior exposure to almond on its own, and half had received no preexposure. In Experiment 1, in which the rats were hungry during the test, the preference was greater in the nonpreexposed subjects, both for those trained with fructose and those trained with maltodextrin; that is, latent inhibition was obtained with both reinforcers. In Experiment 2, in which the rats were not food deprived prior to the test, not only was there no latent inhibition with either of the reinforcers, but, for both, the preference was greater for preexposed than for nonpreexposed subjects. These results give no support to the proposal that different types of reinforcer generate different types of learning. They are, however, consistent with the proposal that different types of learning control behavior when a rat is hungry and when it is not, and that the form that generates the preference in the latter case is not susceptible to the latent inhibition effect.
机译:在两个实验中,大鼠接受了杏仁味与果糖或麦芽糊精的配对,然后测试了杏仁的条件偏好。在每个实验中,一半的大鼠单独接受杏仁的事先暴露,另一半则没有进行预暴露。在试验1中,试验过程中大鼠处于饥饿状态,在未预先暴露的受试者中,对接受果糖训练的人和接受麦芽糊精训练的人的偏爱更大。也就是说,两种增强剂均获得了潜在的抑制作用。在实验2中,在试验前没有剥夺大鼠的食物,不仅没有一种补强剂具有潜在的抑制作用,而且对于这两种增强剂,预先暴露的受试者比未预先暴露的受试者的偏好更大。这些结果不支持不同类型的增强器产生不同类型的学习的建议。但是,它们与这样的提议相一致,即当大鼠饥饿时和不饥饿时,不同类型的学习控制行为,并且在后一种情况下产生偏好的形式不易受到潜在的抑制作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号