首页> 外文期刊>Legal medicine >Postmortem computed tomography angiography, contrast medium administration and toxicological analyses in urine
【24h】

Postmortem computed tomography angiography, contrast medium administration and toxicological analyses in urine

机译:事后计算机断层扫描血管造影,造影剂施用和尿液毒理学分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Postmortem angiography methods that use water soluble or lipid soluble liquid contrast compounds may potentially modify the composition of fluid-based biological samples and thus influence toxicological findings. In this study, we investigated whether toxicological investigations performed in urine collected prior to and post angiography using Angiofil (TM) mixed with paraffin oil are characterized by different qualitative or quantitative results. In addition, we studied whether diluting samples with 1% and 3% contrast medium solution may modify molecule concentration. A postmortem angiography group consisting of 50 cases and a postmortem group without angiography consisting of 50 cases were formed. In the first group, toxicological investigations were performed in urine samples collected prior to and post angiography as well as in undiluted and diluted samples. In the second group, analyses were performed in undiluted and diluted urine, bile, gastric content, cerebrospinal and pericardial fluids collected during autopsy. The preliminary results indicate that differences may be observed between urine samples collected prior to and post angiography in the number of identified molecules in relation to specific cases. Analyses performed in diluted samples failed to reveal differences that might potentially alter the interpretation of toxicological results in all analyzed specimens for nearly all molecules, except for tetrahydrocannabinol and its metabolites. Though these findings suggest that toxicology might be effectively performed, in very special cases and for a large number of molecules, in biological samples collected after angiography, it remains recommendable to collect biological fluids for toxicology prior to contrast medium injection. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:使用水溶性或脂溶性液体造影剂的事后血管造影方法可能会改变基于液体的生物样品的成分,从而影响毒理学发现。在这项研究中,我们调查了使用Angiofil(TM)和石蜡油对血管造影术前后收集的尿液进行的毒理学调查是否具有不同的定性或定量结果。此外,我们研究了用1%和3%的造影剂溶液稀释样品是否会改变分子浓度。形成了由50例组成的尸检血管造影组和由50例组成的无血管造影的尸检组。在第一组中,对血管造影前后收集的尿液样本以及未稀释和稀释的样本进行了毒理学调查。在第二组中,对在尸检过程中收集的未稀释和稀释的尿液,胆汁,胃内容物,脑脊液和心包液进行了分析。初步结果表明,在血管造影之前和之后收集的尿液样本之间可能会发现与特定病例相关的已鉴定分子数量的差异。在稀释样品中进行的分析未能揭示差异,这可能会改变所有分析样品中几乎所有分子的毒理学结果的解释,除了四氢大麻酚及其代谢物。尽管这些发现表明,在非常特殊的情况下并且对于大量分子,可以有效地进行毒理学检查,但在血管造影后收集的生物样品中,仍然建议在注射造影剂之前收集生物液进行毒理学检查。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号