首页> 外文期刊>Langenbeck's archives of surgery >Laparoscopic TME in rectal cancer--electronic supplementary: op-video.
【24h】

Laparoscopic TME in rectal cancer--electronic supplementary: op-video.

机译:腹腔镜TME在直肠癌中的应用-电子补充资料:视频。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer has been proved in various studies. The minimal invasive procedure is feasible and safe which was demonstrated in many studies. However, the results of prospective, randomized studies providing valuable evidence are still not available. Compared to conventional surgery, the laparoscopic technique has short-term advantages including less pain, shorter duration of postoperative ileus, less fatigue, better pulmonary function, and less blood loss (Leung et al., Lancet 363:1187-1192, 2004; Braga et al., Dis Colon Rectum 48:217-223, 2005; Jayne et al., J Clin Oncol 25:3061-3068, 2007; Agha et al., Surg Endosc 22:2229-2237, 2008). METHODS: The autonomic nerve sparing TME technique is the gold standard in rectal cancer resection even in conventional or laparoscopic procedure. With regard of the oncological dimension, the laparoscopic TME technique is not different compared to the open procedure. However, a standardized laparoscopic step-by-step procedure may simplify the operation and can reduce operation time. RESULTS: There are no studies available which compare different types of TME procedures. Most surgeons start the operation left laterally mobilizing the sigmoid colon first. In the laparoscopic technique, we recommend the medial to lateral approach starting the operation at the right side of the rectum and sigmoid colon. A nerve sparing TME technique can be performed easier, and the identification of the left ureter may be simplified. After multiple workshops and extensive discussion with national and international experts, we developed a standardized laparoscopic "10 step TME procedure." Reviewing the results of laparoscopic TME the studies do not allow firm conclusions as to the questions of whether the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic TME is equal or superior to open TME (Breukink et al. 2006). Actually, we are waiting for large prospective randomized studies comparing laparoscopic TME with the traditional open procedure (Bonjer et al., Dan Med Bull 56:89-91, 2009). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic TME appears to have clinically measurable short-term advantages in patients with primary resectable rectal cancer based on evidence mainly from nonrandomized studies (Breukink et al. 5). In nearly all published studies, the efficacy and technical feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer could be demonstrated regarding perioperative morbidity and oncological outcome. A standardized laparoscopic TME technique can be strongly recommended.
机译:背景:腹腔镜直肠系膜全直肠切除术(TME)已在各种研究中得到证明。微创手术是可行且安全的,这在许多研究中都得到了证明。但是,尚无前瞻性,随机研究提供有价值的证据。与常规手术相比,腹腔镜技术具有短期优势,包括更少的痛苦,较短的肠梗阻持续时间,更少的疲劳,更好的肺功能以及更少的失血(Leung等人,柳叶刀363:1187-1192,2004; Braga等人,Dis Colon Rectum 48:217-223,2005; Jayne等人,J Clin Oncol 25:3061-3068,2007; Agha等人,Surg Endosc 22:2229-2237,2008)。方法:即使在常规或腹腔镜手术中,保留自主神经的TME技术也是直肠癌切除术的金标准。就肿瘤学方面而言,腹腔镜TME技术与开放手术相比没有什么不同。但是,标准化的腹腔镜分步程序可以简化操作并可以减少手术时间。结果:目前尚无可比较不同类型TME程序的研究。大多数外科医生首先开始左侧动员乙状结肠的手术。在腹腔镜技术中,我们建议从内侧到外侧入路,在直肠和乙状结肠的右侧开始手术。保留神经的TME技术可以更容易地执行,并且可以简化左输尿管的识别。经过多次研讨会和与国内外专家的广泛讨论,我们开发了标准化的腹腔镜“ 10步TME程序”。回顾腹腔镜TME的结果,这些研究并未就腹腔镜TME的安全性和有效性是否等于或优于开放TME提出疑问(Breukink等,2006)。实际上,我们正在等待进行大量前瞻性随机研究,以比较腹腔镜TME与传统开放手术(Bonjer等人,Dan Med Bull 56:89-91,2009)。结论:基于主要来自非随机研究的证据,腹腔镜TME在原发性可切除直肠癌患者中似乎具有临床上可测量的短期优势(Breukink等人5)。在几乎所有已发表的研究中,就围手术期发病率和肿瘤学结局而言,可以证明腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌的功效和技术可行性。强烈建议使用标准化的腹腔镜TME技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号