...
首页> 外文期刊>Landscape and Urban Planning >Integrating ecosystem services and local government finances into land use planning: A case study from coastal Georgia
【24h】

Integrating ecosystem services and local government finances into land use planning: A case study from coastal Georgia

机译:将生态系统服务和地方政府资金整合到土地使用规划中:来自乔治亚州沿海地区的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This work presents a novel approach to assessing the impact of future growth in rural regions faced with rapid growth. We investigate one of the most rural counties on the eastern coast of the U.S. (McIntosh County, Georgia) from the dual perspective of (1) ecosystem services and (2) costs assumed by local government. As land cover in our focal locality is overwhelmingly forest or wetland, we compiled estimates from multiple sources to map the value per ha/year of (1) timber sales and recreational leases to private landowners and (2) a suite of non-market public amenities: rare species habitat, carbon sequestration, flood control, pollution treatment, water supply, and storm protection. We then quantified, based on county budgets, expenditures and revenues deriving from major land use categories (residential, commercial/industrial, agricultural/open-space). Results indicate that (1) forested wetlands generate relatively little revenue to either private landowners or in taxes to the county from extractive uses, but have very high value relative other land cover types in the provision of ecosystem services, (2) forest lands contribute much more in revenue than they receive in services, whereas residential properties cost more in services, than they generate in revenue, and (3) significant gains in both ecosystem service preservation, hazard reduction, and in lower costs to the county in municipal services could be achieved by restricting new development from within the Federal Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)-determined 500 year floodplain
机译:这项工作提出了一种新颖的方法来评估面对快速增长的农村地区未来增长的影响。我们从(1)生态系统服务和(2)地方政府承担的成本的双重视角调查了美国东部沿海地区最农村的县之一(佐治亚州麦金托什县)。由于我们重点地区的土地覆盖绝大多数是森林或湿地,因此我们从多个来源汇总了估算值,以绘制(1)向私人土地所有者的木材销售和休闲租赁以及(2)一系列非市场公共场所的每公顷/年的价值。便利设施:稀有物种栖息地,碳固存,防洪,污染处理,供水和防暴。然后,我们根据县预算,对主要土地利用类别(住宅,商业/工业,农业/开放空间)的支出和收入进行量化。结果表明:(1)森林湿地给私人土地所有者或采伐用途给县带来的税收相对较少,但在提供生态系统服务方面相对于其他土地覆盖类型具有很高的价值,(2)林地贡献很大收入多于其在服务中获得的收入,而住宅物业在服务中的成本要比它们在收入中产生的多,并且(3)生态系统服务的保存,减灾和县级市政服务成本的显着提高可能是通过限制由联邦保险费率地图(FIRM)确定的500年洪泛区中的新开发项目而实现

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号