首页> 外文期刊>Landscape and Urban Planning >Institutional efficiency of urban soil sealing management - From raising awareness to better implementation of sustainable development in Germany
【24h】

Institutional efficiency of urban soil sealing management - From raising awareness to better implementation of sustainable development in Germany

机译:城市土壤密封管理的机构效率-从提高意识到更好地实施德国的可持续发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite a shrinking population, soil sealing and land consumption is still increasing in Europe. In an increasingly urbanized world, scarcity of space is rising. Under the umbrella of sustainable urban land use, conflicts between residential, commercial, industrial, transport and green areas need to be solved balancing social, economic and environmental objectives. However, managing urban environments and steering soil sealing is a challenge for policymakers and planners dealing with land use conflicts due to their complex constraints and driving forces. This paper investigates which strategies can be characterized as being institutionally efficient and contributing to a reduction in urban soil sealing. The analyses are conducted in Munich and Leipzig, Germany. For the evaluation, the method of Response-Efficiency-Assessment (REA) is applied using subjective and objective indicators, which are evaluated by a content analysis and Internet survey. Strategies of the following types are assessed: legal-planning, informal planning, economic-fiscal, co-operative and informational. Results show that informal planning strategies are institutionally the most efficient due to high flexibility, high acceptance and limited reduction in local authority, which legal-planning responses lack. Current economic-fiscal responses are assessed as being the most inefficient, and there is a need for implementing new taxes, which among other things can promote the protection of fertile soils. It is concluded that local authorities need to be more aware of their authority and responsibility to limit soil sealing and to guarantee a high urban living quality. Hence, more stringent rules should be justified with proof of their effectiveness before implementation
机译:尽管人口减少,但欧洲的土壤封闭和土地消耗仍在增加。在日益城市化的世界中,空间的稀缺性正在上升。在可持续的城市土地利用的保护下,需要解决居住,商业,工业,交通和绿地之间的冲突,以平衡社会,经济和环境目标。但是,管理城市环境和控制土壤密封对于处理土地使用冲突的决策者和规划者来说是一个挑战,因为他们的约束和驱动力复杂。本文研究了哪些策略可以被认为具有制度上的效率并有助于减少城市土壤封闭。分析在德国慕尼黑和莱比锡进行。对于评估,使用主观和客观指标来应用响应效率评估(REA)方法,这些指标通过内容分析和Internet调查进行评估。评估以下类型的策略:法律计划,非正式计划,经济财政,合作和信息。结果表明,非正式计划战略在制度上是最有效的,这是由于法律计划对策缺乏灵活性,高度接受和地方权力的有限减少。目前的经济-财政对策被认为是效率最低的,因此有必要实施新的税收,除其他外,这些税收可以促进保护肥沃的土壤。结论是,地方政府需要更加了解自己的权力和责任,以限制土壤封闭和保证较高的城市生活质量。因此,更严格的规则应在执行之前证明其有效性是合理的

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号