...
【24h】

Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Get engaged.

机译:对协议审查方案的响应:参与进来。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

I will assume that the wildlife rehabilitation organization (WRO), Happy Trails, has regulated species on site, has the necessary wildlife permits and meets all local requirements. There does not seem to be any lease agreement spelling out the terms of performance of Great Eastern and Happy Trails. Therefore, several issues should be explored: Who owns the animals? If a tenant fails to comply with the law, is the landlord liable? Is the WRO required to have an IACUC or IACUC approval of its animal activities? Can Great Eastern's IACUC suspend animal activities wholly conducted by another entity at a facility managed by the 'external' entity?
机译:我将假设野生动物康复组织(WRO),快乐之路(Happy Trails)已在现场对物种进行监管,拥有必要的野生生物许可证并符合当地的所有要求。似乎没有任何租赁协议阐明大东方航空和Happy Trails的履行条款。因此,应该探讨几个问题:谁拥有动物?如果房客不遵守法律,房东应负赔偿责任吗?是否要求WRO对其动物活动进行IACUC或IACUC批准?大东方的IACUC是否可以在“外部”实体管理的设施中暂停由另一实体完全进行的动物活动?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号