首页> 外文期刊>La Medicina del lavoro >Context specificity in the assessment of psychosocial risk at work: an empirical study on Italian call centre workers
【24h】

Context specificity in the assessment of psychosocial risk at work: an empirical study on Italian call centre workers

机译:评估工作中的社会心理风险时的情境特异性:对意大利呼叫中心工作人员的实证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Following EU requirements, in recent years standard procedures for the assessment of work-related stress have been developed in Italy. However, while such standardization has facilitated the spread and use of these procedures, it has brought a lack of specificity in risk assessment. Objectives: To exemplify a method for the assessment of work-related stress that was developed by the University of Milan to allow the definition of risk profiles tailored to the different organizational settings. Methods: We examined risk factors for work-related stress in call centre operators employed by two separate Italian companies. At an early stage of the assessment procedure, we conducted a wide series of consultation and training activities that allowed the identification of context-specific risk factors and homogeneous groups, which fuelled the preparation of both the "objective" and the "subjective" evaluation instruments. Results: Results obtained by means of the standardized "Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire" and "Job Content Questionnaire", interpreted in the light of consultations with key organizational figures and individual interviews with employees, have allowed the detection of different risk profiles and priorities for intervention at both the group and the organizational levels. Conclusions: Findings demonstrated the existence of both common and specific risk factors in the two companies, which would have remained undetected with the exclusive use of standardized approaches.
机译:背景:遵循欧盟的要求,近年来,意大利制定了评估与工作有关的压力的标准程序。然而,尽管这种标准化促进了这些程序的推广和使用,但在风险评估中却缺乏特异性。目标:举例说明米兰大学开发的一种用于评估与工作相关的压力的方法,以允许根据不同的组织环境来定义风险概况。方法:我们检查了两家独立的意大利公司雇用的呼叫中心接线员的工作压力相关风险因素。在评估程序的早期阶段,我们进行了一系列的咨询和培训活动,这些活动可以识别特定于上下文的风险因素和同类人群,从而推动了“客观”和“主观”评估工具的编制。结果:通过与主要组织人物进行磋商并与员工进行个人访谈,通过标准化的“工作量奖励不平衡调查表”和“工作内容调查表”获得的结果可以发现不同的风险特征和优先级在团体和组织层面进行干预。结论:调查结果表明两家公司同时存在共同和特定的风险因素,而仅使用标准化方法就无法发现这些风险因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号