首页> 外文期刊>Nursing inquiry >Ways of knowing: realism, non-realism, nominalism and a typology revisited with a counter perspective for nursing science
【24h】

Ways of knowing: realism, non-realism, nominalism and a typology revisited with a counter perspective for nursing science

机译:认识方式:现实主义,非现实主义,唯名主义和类型学,从护理科学的反面来看

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper, we reconsider the context of Barbara Carper's alternative ways of knowing, a prominent discourse in modern nursing theory in North America. We explore this relative to the concepts of realism, non-realism and nominalism, and investigate the philosophical divisions behind the original typology, particularly in relationship to modern scientific enquiry. We examine forms of knowledge relative to realist and nominalist positions and make an argument ad absurdum against relativistic interpretations of knowledge using the example of Borge's Chinese Emporium of Benevolent Knowledge. We propose a contentious postpositivist practical classification for nursing knowledge that demonstrates and supports the idea that knowledge has both individual and subjective components. This classification supports the practical application of nursing knowledge within the paradigm of realist postpositivist science.
机译:在本文中,我们重新考虑了芭芭拉·卡珀(Barbara Carper)的另类认识方式的背景,这是北美现代护理理论中的重要论述。我们相对于现实主义,非现实主义和唯名主义的概念进行探索,并研究原始类型学背后的哲学分歧,特别是与现代科学探究的关系。我们考察了与现实主义者和名义主义者立场相关的知识形式,并以博格的中国仁慈知识商场为例,对知识的相对论性解释提出了荒唐的论点。我们为护理知识提出了一个有争议的后实证实践分类,该分类证明并支持知识具有个体和主观成分的观点。这种分类支持护理知识在现实的后实证主义科学范式中的实际应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号