...
首页> 外文期刊>Nursing times. >'Staff don't need another stick to be beaten with'
【24h】

'Staff don't need another stick to be beaten with'

机译:“工作人员不需要再被其他棍子殴打”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We all love a listing. Many a weekend away now starts with a click on TripAdvisor to pick the hottest hotels and the coolest cafes. But transfer this idea to the NHS, as the Friends and Family Test has done, and I am not sure it gives a full picture of how well a department or trust can meet the patient's needs. In fact, many argue scoring hospitals in this way has proved counterproductive. Originally, net promoter scores (the basis for the Friends and Family Tests) were introduced to measure the success of private sector services. It was deemed useful to compare the customer service of, say, one high street bank with another. But there are all sorts of variable factors involved in a visit to, say, an accident and emergency department - how unwell the patient feels, how busy the department is, whether there has been a major incident and so on. I am not saying these variables should not be measured. Far from it - they can be a useful indicator. But we should remember those who score the trusts are self-selecting and so can skew the figures.
机译:我们都喜欢一个清单。现在,距周末数周的旅程开始,首先是点击TripAdvisor,以挑选最热的酒店和最酷的咖啡馆。但是,正如“朋友和家人测试”所做的那样,将这个想法转移到NHS上,我不确定它能否全面说明部门或信托可以满足患者需求的程度。实际上,许多人认为以这种方式给医院打分起了反作用。最初,引入净发起人得分(朋友和家庭测试的基础)来衡量私营部门服务的成功程度。例如,将一家高街银行的客户服务与另一家高街银行的客户服务进行比较被认为是有用的。但是,去急诊室就诊时会涉及各种可变因素,例如患者的感觉不适,急诊室的繁忙程度,是否发生了重大事件等等。我并不是说这些变量不应该测量。远非如此-它们可以成为有用的指标。但是我们应该记住那些得分信任的人是自我选择的,因此可以歪曲数字。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号