首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >Fluoroscopy guided vascular access: asking the right question, but getting the wrong answer?
【24h】

Fluoroscopy guided vascular access: asking the right question, but getting the wrong answer?

机译:透视检查指导血管通路:问正确的问题,但得到错误的答案?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite the provocative title of this editorial, I admire the effort by Abu-Fadel and colleagues in this issue of CCI. They have waded into a vacuum for prospective randomized trials comparing access techniques. It is now 57 years since Seldinger [1] delivered patients from having to undergo surgical cut down to access the femoral artery. Despite the passage of more than a half century, the techniques used by most operators have evolved very little, and by some considerations could be described as incomprehensibly primitive. Complications of vascular access remain the most common causes of morbidity, and some mortality, associated with both the simplest and most sophisticated of percutaneous diagnostic and interventional procedures.
机译:尽管这篇社论标题颇具挑衅性,但我还是赞赏阿布·法德尔(Abu-Fadel)及其同事在本期CCI上所做的努力。他们已经进入了比较准入技术的前瞻性随机试验的真空阶段。自Seldinger [1]使患者无需经过手术切开进入股动脉至今已有57年了。尽管已经过去了半个多世纪,但大多数操作员使用的技术发展甚微,并且出于某些考虑,可以将其描述为难以理解的原始技术。血管通路并发症仍然是最常见的发病率原因,也有一些死亡率,这与最简单,最复杂的经皮诊断和介入程序有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号